Difference between revisions of "2014 USAJMO Problems/Problem 6"

(Solution)
(Solution)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
==Solution==
 
==Solution==
'''Extra karma will be awarded to the benefactor who so kindly provides a diagram and additional LATEX for this solution. Before then, please peruse your own diagram.'''
+
'''Extra karma will be awarded to the benefactor who so kindly provides a diagram and additional LATEX for this solution. Before then, please peruse your own diagram.''' [Diagram and additional <math>\LaTeX</math> by pinetree1]
  
 
<center>
 
<center>
Line 65: Line 65:
 
draw(X--I, dashed);
 
draw(X--I, dashed);
 
draw(C--V, dashed);
 
draw(C--V, dashed);
 
+
draw(A--I);
 +
label("$x^\circ$", A + (0.2,0), dir(90));
 +
label("$y^\circ$", C + (-0.4,0), dir(90));
  
 
</asy></center>
 
</asy></center>
  
We will first prove part (a) via contradiction: assume that line <math>IC</math> intersects line <math>MP</math> at Q and line <math>EF</math> and R, with R and Q not equal to V. Let x = <A/2 = <IAE and y = <C/2 = <ICA. We know that <math>\overline{MP} \parallel \overline{AC}</math> because <math>MP</math> is a midsegment of triangle <math>ABC</math>; thus, by alternate interior angles (A.I.A) <math>\angle MVE = \angle FEA = (180^\circ - 2x) / 2 = 90^\circ - x</math>, because triangle <math>AFE</math> is isosceles. Also by A.I.A, <MQC = <QCA = y. Furthermore, because <math>AI</math> is an angle bisector of triangle <math>AFE</math>, it is also an altitude of the triangle; combining this with <QIA = x + y from the Exterior Angle Theorem gives <math>\angle FRC = 90 - x - y</math>. Also, <math>\angle VRQ = \angle FRC = 90 - x - y</math> because they are vertical angles. This completes part (a).
+
We will first prove part (a) via contradiction: assume that line <math>IC</math> intersects line <math>MP</math> at <math>Q</math> and line <math>EF</math> and <math>R</math>, with <math>R</math> and <math>Q</math> not equal to <math>V</math>. Let <math>x = \angle A/2 = \angle IAE</math> and <math>y = \angle C/2 = \angle ICA</math>. We know that <math>\overline{MP} \parallel \overline{AC}</math> because <math>MP</math> is a midsegment of triangle <math>ABC</math>; thus, by alternate interior angles (A.I.A) <math>\angle MVE = \angle FEA = (180^\circ - 2x) / 2 = 90^\circ - x</math>, because triangle <math>AFE</math> is isosceles. Also by A.I.A, <math>\angle MQC = \angle QCA = y</math>. Furthermore, because <math>AI</math> is an angle bisector of triangle <math>AFE</math>, it is also an altitude of the triangle; combining this with <math>\angle QIA = x + y</math> from the Exterior Angle Theorem gives <math>\angle FRC = 90 - x - y</math>. Also, <math>\angle VRQ = \angle FRC = 90 - x - y</math> because they are vertical angles. This completes part (a).
  
Now, we attempt part (b). Using a similar argument to part (a), point U lies on line <math>BI</math>. Because <MVC = <VCA = <MCV, triangle <math>VMC</math> is isosceles. Similarly, triangle <math>BMU</math> is isosceles, from which we derive that VM = MC = MB = MU. Hence, triangle <math>VUM</math> is isosceles.
+
Now, we attempt part (b). Using a similar argument to part (a), point U lies on line <math>BI</math>. Because <math>\angle MVC = \angle VCA = \angle MCV</math>, triangle <math>VMC</math> is isosceles. Similarly, triangle <math>BMU</math> is isosceles, from which we derive that <math>VM = MC = MB = MU</math>. Hence, triangle <math>VUM</math> is isosceles.
  
Note that X lies on both the circumcircle and the perpendicular bisector of segment <math>BC</math>. Let D be the midpoint of <math>UV</math>; our goal is to prove that points X, D, and I are collinear, which equates to proving <math>X</math> lies on ray <math>ID</math>.
+
Note that <math>X</math> lies on both the circumcircle and the perpendicular bisector of segment <math>BC</math>. Let <math>D</math> be the midpoint of <math>UV</math>; our goal is to prove that points <math>X</math>, <math>D</math>, and <math>I</math> are collinear, which equates to proving <math>X</math> lies on ray <math>ID</math>.
  
 
Because <math>MD</math> is also an altitude of triangle <math>MVU</math>, and <math>MD</math> and <math>IA</math> are both perpendicular to <math>EF</math>, <math>\overline{MD} \parallel \overline{IA}</math>. Furthermore, we have <math>\angle VMD = \angle UMD = x</math> because <math>APMN</math> is a parallelogram.
 
Because <math>MD</math> is also an altitude of triangle <math>MVU</math>, and <math>MD</math> and <math>IA</math> are both perpendicular to <math>EF</math>, <math>\overline{MD} \parallel \overline{IA}</math>. Furthermore, we have <math>\angle VMD = \angle UMD = x</math> because <math>APMN</math> is a parallelogram.

Revision as of 22:09, 1 December 2014

Problem

Let $ABC$ be a triangle with incenter $I$, incircle $\gamma$ and circumcircle $\Gamma$. Let $M,N,P$ be the midpoints of sides $\overline{BC}$, $\overline{CA}$, $\overline{AB}$ and let $E,F$ be the tangency points of $\gamma$ with $\overline{CA}$ and $\overline{AB}$, respectively. Let $U,V$ be the intersections of line $EF$ with line $MN$ and line $MP$, respectively, and let $X$ be the midpoint of arc $BAC$ of $\Gamma$.

(a) Prove that $I$ lies on ray $CV$.

(b) Prove that line $XI$ bisects $\overline{UV}$.

Solution

Extra karma will be awarded to the benefactor who so kindly provides a diagram and additional LATEX for this solution. Before then, please peruse your own diagram. [Diagram and additional $\LaTeX$ by pinetree1]

[asy] unitsize(5cm); import olympiad; pair A, B, C, I, M, N, P, E, F, U, V, X, R; A = dir(190); B = dir(120); C = dir(350); I = incenter(A, B, C);  label("$A$", A, W); label("$B$", B, dir(90)); label("$C$", C, dir(0));  dot(I); label("$I$", I, SSE); draw(A--B--C--cycle);  real r, R; r = inradius(A, B, C); R = circumradius(A, B, C);  path G, g; G = circumcircle(A, B, C); g = incircle(A, B, C);  draw(G); draw(g); label("$\Gamma$", dir(35), dir(35)); label("$\gamma$", 2/3 * dir(125));  M = (B+C)/2; N = (A+C)/2; P = (A+B)/2;  label("$M$", M, NE); label("$N$", N, SE); label("$P$", P, W);  E = tangent(A, I, r, 1);  F = tangent(A, I, r, 2);  label("$E$", E, SW); label("$F$", F, WNW);  U = extension(E, F, M, N); V = intersectionpoint(P--M, F--E);   label("$U$", U, S); label("$V$", V, NE);  draw(P--M--U--F);   X = dir(235); label("$X$", X, dir(235));  draw(X--I, dashed); draw(C--V, dashed); draw(A--I); label("$x^\circ$", A + (0.2,0), dir(90)); label("$y^\circ$", C + (-0.4,0), dir(90));  [/asy]

We will first prove part (a) via contradiction: assume that line $IC$ intersects line $MP$ at $Q$ and line $EF$ and $R$, with $R$ and $Q$ not equal to $V$. Let $x = \angle A/2 = \angle IAE$ and $y = \angle C/2 = \angle ICA$. We know that $\overline{MP} \parallel \overline{AC}$ because $MP$ is a midsegment of triangle $ABC$; thus, by alternate interior angles (A.I.A) $\angle MVE = \angle FEA = (180^\circ - 2x) / 2 = 90^\circ - x$, because triangle $AFE$ is isosceles. Also by A.I.A, $\angle MQC = \angle QCA = y$. Furthermore, because $AI$ is an angle bisector of triangle $AFE$, it is also an altitude of the triangle; combining this with $\angle QIA = x + y$ from the Exterior Angle Theorem gives $\angle FRC = 90 - x - y$. Also, $\angle VRQ = \angle FRC = 90 - x - y$ because they are vertical angles. This completes part (a).

Now, we attempt part (b). Using a similar argument to part (a), point U lies on line $BI$. Because $\angle MVC = \angle VCA = \angle MCV$, triangle $VMC$ is isosceles. Similarly, triangle $BMU$ is isosceles, from which we derive that $VM = MC = MB = MU$. Hence, triangle $VUM$ is isosceles.

Note that $X$ lies on both the circumcircle and the perpendicular bisector of segment $BC$. Let $D$ be the midpoint of $UV$; our goal is to prove that points $X$, $D$, and $I$ are collinear, which equates to proving $X$ lies on ray $ID$.

Because $MD$ is also an altitude of triangle $MVU$, and $MD$ and $IA$ are both perpendicular to $EF$, $\overline{MD} \parallel \overline{IA}$. Furthermore, we have $\angle VMD = \angle UMD = x$ because $APMN$ is a parallelogram.