Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chinese Remainder Theorem/Introductory"
Mysmartmouth (talk | contribs) (More Info) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is an experiment with writing style rather than anything else. I'd like to know whether such a style is acceptable, or you prefer something more formal (like Statement-Proof-Discussion format), or you would like to see some more "introductory" material. Please, share your opinions :).--[[User:Fedja|Fedja]] 17:17, 21 June 2006 (EDT) | This is an experiment with writing style rather than anything else. I'd like to know whether such a style is acceptable, or you prefer something more formal (like Statement-Proof-Discussion format), or you would like to see some more "introductory" material. Please, share your opinions :).--[[User:Fedja|Fedja]] 17:17, 21 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == More Info == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The writing style is fine, in my opinion. However, I'm not sure that this covers the entire CRT; I'll try to add some more stuff. There was a nice discussion of this in the SC forum. --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Sean]] 23:29, 22 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:29, 22 June 2006
This is an experiment with writing style rather than anything else. I'd like to know whether such a style is acceptable, or you prefer something more formal (like Statement-Proof-Discussion format), or you would like to see some more "introductory" material. Please, share your opinions :).--Fedja 17:17, 21 June 2006 (EDT)
More Info
The writing style is fine, in my opinion. However, I'm not sure that this covers the entire CRT; I'll try to add some more stuff. There was a nice discussion of this in the SC forum. --Sean 23:29, 22 June 2006 (EDT)
