Difference between revisions of "2007 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
m |
m (→Solution) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
<b>Case </b>1) <math>d=0</math> | <b>Case </b>1) <math>d=0</math> | ||
− | If <math>d=0</math>, <math>\max\{|x_i-a_i|:1\le i\le n\}</math> is the maximum of a set of non-negative number, which must be | + | If <math>d=0</math>, <math>\max\{|x_i-a_i|:1\le i\le n\}</math> is the maximum of a set of non-negative number, which must be at least <math>0</math>. |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
<cmath>x_p-x_q>a_p-a_q-d=a_p-a_q-a_p+a_q=0</cmath> | <cmath>x_p-x_q>a_p-a_q-d=a_p-a_q-a_p+a_q=0</cmath> | ||
− | <math>x_p>x_q</math> --- contradiction. | + | <math>x_p>x_q</math> --- contradiction (<math>p\le q \rightarrow x_p\le x_q</math>). |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
<math>-\dfrac{d}{2} \le (a_m-a_i)\dfrac{d}{2} \le \dfrac{d}{2}</math> | <math>-\dfrac{d}{2} \le (a_m-a_i)\dfrac{d}{2} \le \dfrac{d}{2}</math> | ||
− | <math>\left|(a_m-a_i)\dfrac{d}{2}\right|=|x_i-a_i|\le \frac{d}{2}</math> | + | <math>\left|(a_m-a_i)-\dfrac{d}{2}\right|=|x_i-a_i|\le \frac{d}{2}</math> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
== Resources == | == Resources == | ||
− | {{IMO box|year=2007||num-a=2}} | + | {{IMO box|year=2007|before=First question|num-a=2}} |
* <url>viewtopic.php?p=894656#p894656 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url> | * <url>viewtopic.php?p=894656#p894656 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url> |
Latest revision as of 22:15, 31 March 2010
Problem
Real numbers are given. For each () define
and let
.
(a) Prove that, for any real numbers ,
(b) Show that there are real numbers such that equality holds in (*)
Solution
Since , all can be expressed as , where .
Thus, can be expressed as for some and ,
Lemma)
Assume for contradiction that , then for all ,
Then, is a non-decreasing function, which means, , and , which means, .
Then, and contradiction.
a)
Case 1)
If , is the maximum of a set of non-negative number, which must be at least .
Case 2) (We can ignore because of lemma)
Using the fact that can be expressed as for some and , .
Assume for contradiction that .
Then, , .
, and
Thus, and .
Subtracting the two inequality, we will obtain:
--- contradiction ().
Thus,
(b)
A set of where the equality in (*) holds is:
Since is a non-decreasing function, is non-decreasing.
:
Let , .
Thus, ( because is the max of a set including )
Since and ,
This is written by Mo Lam--- who is a horrible proof writer, so please fix the proof for me. Thank you. O, also the formatting.
--> Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
Resources
2007 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First question |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |
- <url>viewtopic.php?p=894656#p894656 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url>