Difference between revisions of "2007 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
m (Created page with '<Strong>Problem 1</Strong> <hr> Real numbers <math>a_1, a_2, \dots , a_n</math> are given. For each <math>i</math> (<math>1\le i\le n</math>) define <cmath>d_i=\max\{a_j:1\le …') |
m (→Solution) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ==Problem== | |
− | |||
− | |||
Real numbers <math>a_1, a_2, \dots , a_n</math> are given. For each <math>i</math> (<math>1\le i\le n</math>) define | Real numbers <math>a_1, a_2, \dots , a_n</math> are given. For each <math>i</math> (<math>1\le i\le n</math>) define | ||
Line 21: | Line 19: | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
− | + | ==Solution== | |
Since <math>d_i=\max\{a_j:1\le j\le i\}-\min\{a_j:i\le j\le n\}</math>, all <math>d_i</math> can be expressed as <math>a_p-a_q</math>, where <math>1\le p\le i\le q \le n</math>. | Since <math>d_i=\max\{a_j:1\le j\le i\}-\min\{a_j:i\le j\le n\}</math>, all <math>d_i</math> can be expressed as <math>a_p-a_q</math>, where <math>1\le p\le i\le q \le n</math>. | ||
Line 33: | Line 31: | ||
Assume for contradiction that <math>d<0</math>, then for all <math>i</math>, <math>a_i \le \max\{a_j:1\le j\le i\}\le \min\{a_j:i\le j\le n\}\le a_{i+1}</math> | Assume for contradiction that <math>d<0</math>, then for all <math>i</math>, <math>a_i \le \max\{a_j:1\le j\le i\}\le \min\{a_j:i\le j\le n\}\le a_{i+1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
<math>a_i\le a_{i+1}</math> | <math>a_i\le a_{i+1}</math> | ||
Line 45: | Line 44: | ||
<b>Case </b>1) <math>d=0</math> | <b>Case </b>1) <math>d=0</math> | ||
− | If <math>d=0</math>, <math>\max\{|x_i-a_i|:1\le i\le n\}</math> is the maximum of a set of non-negative number, which must be | + | If <math>d=0</math>, <math>\max\{|x_i-a_i|:1\le i\le n\}</math> is the maximum of a set of non-negative number, which must be at least <math>0</math>. |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 65: | Line 64: | ||
<cmath>x_p-x_q>a_p-a_q-d=a_p-a_q-a_p+a_q=0</cmath> | <cmath>x_p-x_q>a_p-a_q-d=a_p-a_q-a_p+a_q=0</cmath> | ||
− | <math>x_p>x_q</math> --- contradiction. | + | <math>x_p>x_q</math> --- contradiction (<math>p\le q \rightarrow x_p\le x_q</math>). |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 75: | Line 74: | ||
<b>(b) </b> | <b>(b) </b> | ||
− | A set of {x_i} where the equality in (*) holds is: | + | A set of <math>{x_i}</math> where the equality in (*) holds is: |
<cmath>x_i=\max\{a_j:1\le j\le i\}-\frac{d}{2}</cmath> | <cmath>x_i=\max\{a_j:1\le j\le i\}-\frac{d}{2}</cmath> | ||
Line 97: | Line 96: | ||
<math>-\dfrac{d}{2} \le (a_m-a_i)\dfrac{d}{2} \le \dfrac{d}{2}</math> | <math>-\dfrac{d}{2} \le (a_m-a_i)\dfrac{d}{2} \le \dfrac{d}{2}</math> | ||
− | <math>\left|(a_m-a_i)\dfrac{d}{2}\right|=|x_i-a_i|\le \frac{d}{2}</math> | + | <math>\left|(a_m-a_i)-\dfrac{d}{2}\right|=|x_i-a_i|\le \frac{d}{2}</math> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 107: | Line 106: | ||
This is written by Mo Lam--- who is a horrible proof writer, so please fix the proof for me. Thank you. O, also the formatting. | This is written by Mo Lam--- who is a horrible proof writer, so please fix the proof for me. Thank you. O, also the formatting. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <hr/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | --> | ||
+ | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Resources == | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{IMO box|year=2007|before=First question|num-a=2}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | * <url>viewtopic.php?p=894656#p894656 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url> |
Latest revision as of 22:15, 31 March 2010
Problem
Real numbers are given. For each () define
and let
.
(a) Prove that, for any real numbers ,
(b) Show that there are real numbers such that equality holds in (*)
Solution
Since , all can be expressed as , where .
Thus, can be expressed as for some and ,
Lemma)
Assume for contradiction that , then for all ,
Then, is a non-decreasing function, which means, , and , which means, .
Then, and contradiction.
a)
Case 1)
If , is the maximum of a set of non-negative number, which must be at least .
Case 2) (We can ignore because of lemma)
Using the fact that can be expressed as for some and , .
Assume for contradiction that .
Then, , .
, and
Thus, and .
Subtracting the two inequality, we will obtain:
--- contradiction ().
Thus,
(b)
A set of where the equality in (*) holds is:
Since is a non-decreasing function, is non-decreasing.
:
Let , .
Thus, ( because is the max of a set including )
Since and ,
This is written by Mo Lam--- who is a horrible proof writer, so please fix the proof for me. Thank you. O, also the formatting.
--> Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
Resources
2007 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First question |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |
- <url>viewtopic.php?p=894656#p894656 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url>