Difference between revisions of "Talk:Divisibility"
IntrepidMath (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think divisibility rules deserve their very own page. The subject of divisibility alone is plenty big enough as it is.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 18:15, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | I think divisibility rules deserve their very own page. The subject of divisibility alone is plenty big enough as it is.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 18:15, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Indeed they do. That page should also contain derivations, etc. I just moved around a bit of the article, and made the divisibility section a sub-section. --[[User:IntrepidMath|IntrepidMath]] 18:23, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:23, 18 June 2006
I think divisibility rules deserve their very own page. The subject of divisibility alone is plenty big enough as it is.--MCrawford 18:15, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
Indeed they do. That page should also contain derivations, etc. I just moved around a bit of the article, and made the divisibility section a sub-section. --IntrepidMath 18:23, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
