Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Theorems"
(New page: Sorry if this is rude, but what is the point of this category? —~~~~) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sorry if this is rude, but what is the point of this category? —[[User:Boy Soprano II|Boy Soprano II]] 18:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | Sorry if this is rude, but what is the point of this category? —[[User:Boy Soprano II|Boy Soprano II]] 18:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I guess it's here for reference (like, say I couldn't spell Demviore's) and for completeness (to see what related articles are missing). <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 21:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | But wouldn't it be more useful for you to look in a geometry or trig or complex numbers category if you can't spell? And wouldn't subject categories make more sense if you're looking to see what's missing? It seems to me that we might as well have a Category:Articles whose name starts with a vowel. —[[User:Boy Soprano II|Boy Soprano II]] 17:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Nice idea. [[User:Azjps|Category:Articles that Start With a Vowel]]. | ||
| + | :The category doesn't do any harm by itself, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Mathematical_theorems similar categories] exist on Wikipedia [for example], but I suppose minor edits solely for the sake of adding a category to an article should be discouraged, which is what I imagine you're considering. <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 18:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:00, 16 June 2008
Sorry if this is rude, but what is the point of this category? —Boy Soprano II 18:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- I guess it's here for reference (like, say I couldn't spell Demviore's) and for completeness (to see what related articles are missing). Azjps (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
But wouldn't it be more useful for you to look in a geometry or trig or complex numbers category if you can't spell? And wouldn't subject categories make more sense if you're looking to see what's missing? It seems to me that we might as well have a Category:Articles whose name starts with a vowel. —Boy Soprano II 17:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Nice idea. Category:Articles that Start With a Vowel.
- The category doesn't do any harm by itself, and similar categories exist on Wikipedia [for example], but I suppose minor edits solely for the sake of adding a category to an article should be discouraged, which is what I imagine you're considering. Azjps (talk) 18:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
