Difference between revisions of "User talk:Chess64"

(Hi,)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Pshhh...whatever :P --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 16:50, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
 
Pshhh...whatever :P --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 16:50, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
Chess64, could you please put category tags on your Romanian NMO problems?  Thanks.  (They look like this, by the way :  <nowiki>Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems ; Category:Olympiad Combinatorics Problems ; Category:Olympiad Geometry Problems Category: Olympiad Number Theory Problems </nowiki>.)
 +
 +
&mdash;[[User:Boy Soprano II|Boy Soprano II]] 21:15, 27 July 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
Okay, I didn't know about those. --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 10:00, 28 July 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Hi, ==
 +
 +
Any particular reason for deleting the "See also" headings? By convention I include them. <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 20:55, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Okay, I understand what you are saying. I think that linking to other problems from the same contest, even though the subjects may be very different, is still more or less providing navigation to another page, so that it might look slightly awkward without a heading divider between the solution and the box.
 +
 +
:Personally, it doesn't matter much to me whether or not there are these headings, its just that in the hundreds of problem pages we have, all of them do contain a "see also" heading. Thanks, <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 15:45, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Oh wait, now that I think of it, that someone is most likely me (and glancing thru some contributions, it is me). :D <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 19:50, 19 March 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:50, 19 March 2008

Huh. Isn't that an autobiography :P

Joe 15:05, 19 June 2006 (EDT)

Pshhh...whatever :P --Chess64 16:50, 19 June 2006 (EDT)

Chess64, could you please put category tags on your Romanian NMO problems? Thanks. (They look like this, by the way : Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems ; Category:Olympiad Combinatorics Problems ; Category:Olympiad Geometry Problems Category: Olympiad Number Theory Problems .)

Boy Soprano II 21:15, 27 July 2006 (EDT)

Okay, I didn't know about those. --Chess64 10:00, 28 July 2006 (EDT)

Hi,

Any particular reason for deleting the "See also" headings? By convention I include them. Azjps (talk) 20:55, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Okay, I understand what you are saying. I think that linking to other problems from the same contest, even though the subjects may be very different, is still more or less providing navigation to another page, so that it might look slightly awkward without a heading divider between the solution and the box.
Personally, it doesn't matter much to me whether or not there are these headings, its just that in the hundreds of problem pages we have, all of them do contain a "see also" heading. Thanks, Azjps (talk) 15:45, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
Oh wait, now that I think of it, that someone is most likely me (and glancing thru some contributions, it is me). :D Azjps (talk) 19:50, 19 March 2008 (EDT)