Difference between revisions of "Talk:2008 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 24"
Chickendude (talk | contribs) |
Chickendude (talk | contribs) (New section: It Uses AM-GM) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I thought that all AMC problems could be solved using pre-calculus methods? So why does this solution use calculus? Should we write another solution using non-calculus methods? [[User:Chenhsi|Chenhsi]] 00:47, 27 February 2008 (EST) | I thought that all AMC problems could be solved using pre-calculus methods? So why does this solution use calculus? Should we write another solution using non-calculus methods? [[User:Chenhsi|Chenhsi]] 00:47, 27 February 2008 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | This does use pre-calculus. It uses AM-GM. Calculus is just given as an alternative method. If you see, it says "Otherwise, by AM-GM" and goes on. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == It Uses AM-GM == | ||
This does use pre-calculus. It uses AM-GM. Calculus is just given as an alternative method. If you see, it says "Otherwise, by AM-GM" and goes on. | This does use pre-calculus. It uses AM-GM. Calculus is just given as an alternative method. If you see, it says "Otherwise, by AM-GM" and goes on. |
Revision as of 09:31, 27 February 2008
I thought that all AMC problems could be solved using pre-calculus methods? So why does this solution use calculus? Should we write another solution using non-calculus methods? Chenhsi 00:47, 27 February 2008 (EST)
This does use pre-calculus. It uses AM-GM. Calculus is just given as an alternative method. If you see, it says "Otherwise, by AM-GM" and goes on.
It Uses AM-GM
This does use pre-calculus. It uses AM-GM. Calculus is just given as an alternative method. If you see, it says "Otherwise, by AM-GM" and goes on.