Difference between revisions of "Wilson's Theorem"
m (added see also section) |
(added to see also) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Number theory]] | * [[Number theory]] | ||
+ | * [[Modular arithmetic]] | ||
+ | * [[Factorial]] |
Revision as of 16:49, 17 June 2006
Statement
If and only if is a prime, then is a multiple of . In other words .
Proof
Wilson's theorem is easily verifiable for 2 and 3, so let's consider . If is composite, then its positive factors are among . Hence, , so .
However if is prime, then each of the above integers are relatively prime to . So for each of these integers a there is another such that . It is important to note that this is unique modulo , and that since is prime, if and only if is or . Now if we omit 1 and , then the others can be grouped into pairs whose product is congruent to one,
Finally, multiply this equality by to complete the proof. Insert non-formatted text here