Difference between revisions of "1967 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
m |
|||
(18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==Problem== | ||
+ | |||
Let <math>ABCD</math> be a parallelogram with side lengths <math>AB = a</math>, <math>AD = 1</math>, and with <math>\angle BAD = \alpha</math>. | Let <math>ABCD</math> be a parallelogram with side lengths <math>AB = a</math>, <math>AD = 1</math>, and with <math>\angle BAD = \alpha</math>. | ||
If <math>\Delta ABD</math> is acute, prove that the four circles of radius <math>1</math> with centers <math>A</math>, <math>B</math>, <math>C</math>, <math>D</math> cover the parallelogram if and only if | If <math>\Delta ABD</math> is acute, prove that the four circles of radius <math>1</math> with centers <math>A</math>, <math>B</math>, <math>C</math>, <math>D</math> cover the parallelogram if and only if | ||
Line 35: | Line 37: | ||
==Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)== | ==Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)== | ||
− | 1. I am sorry to be so harshly critical, but the solution above | + | <math>\mathbf{Remark\ 1}</math>. I am sorry to be so harshly critical, but the |
− | is deeply flawed. Not only it has errors, but the logic is flawed. | + | solution above is deeply flawed. Not only it has errors, but the |
+ | logic is flawed. | ||
It shows that when <math>a = 2, \alpha = \frac{\pi}{3}</math> the parallelogram | It shows that when <math>a = 2, \alpha = \frac{\pi}{3}</math> the parallelogram | ||
Line 50: | Line 53: | ||
In one short sentence: this is not a solution. | In one short sentence: this is not a solution. | ||
− | 2. The problem itself is mildly flawed. To see this, denote <math>S1, S2</math> | + | <math>\mathbf{Remark\ 2}</math>. The problem itself is mildly flawed. To see this, |
− | the following two statements: | + | denote <math>S1, S2</math> the following two statements: |
S1: The parallelogram <math>ABCD</math> is covered by the four circles of radius | S1: The parallelogram <math>ABCD</math> is covered by the four circles of radius | ||
Line 64: | Line 67: | ||
<math>a \le 2 \cos \left( \alpha - \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{3} \right)</math>. | <math>a \le 2 \cos \left( \alpha - \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{3} \right)</math>. | ||
− | Now notice that if <math>a \le 1</math> then S1 is obviously true. | + | Now notice that if <math>a \le 1</math> then S1 is obviously true. See |
+ | the picture below: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Prob_1967_1_fig1.png|300px]] | ||
Also, notice that if <math>a \le 1</math> and | Also, notice that if <math>a \le 1</math> and | ||
<math>\alpha \in \left( 0, \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} \right) </math> | <math>\alpha \in \left( 0, \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} \right) </math> | ||
− | then <math>S2</math> as | + | then <math>S2</math> is true as well. Indeed |
<math>\left( \alpha - \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{3} \right) \in | <math>\left( \alpha - \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{3} \right) \in | ||
\left( -\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{3}, \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{6} \right)</math>, so | \left( -\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{3}, \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{6} \right)</math>, so | ||
Line 82: | Line 88: | ||
there is something to prove. | there is something to prove. | ||
− | 3. | + | <math>\mathbf{Remark\ 3}</math>. In the proofs I give below, we will see |
− | + | where we need that <math>\triangle ABD</math> is acute. We will see that | |
− | is acute. | + | <math>\alpha < \frac{\pi}{2}</math> is needed for the technicalities of |
+ | the proof. The fact that <math>\angle ADB</math> is acute will be needed | ||
+ | at one crucial point in the proof. | ||
In fact, it is possible to modify <math>S2</math> to a statement <math>S3</math> | In fact, it is possible to modify <math>S2</math> to a statement <math>S3</math> | ||
similar to <math>S2</math> so that <math>S1</math> and <math>S3</math> are equivalent without | similar to <math>S2</math> so that <math>S1</math> and <math>S3</math> are equivalent without | ||
− | any assumption on <math>alpha</math>. I will not go into this, I will | + | any assumption on <math>\alpha</math>. I will not go into this, I will |
just give a hint: Denote <math>\beta = \angle ABC</math>. If <math>\alpha</math> | just give a hint: Denote <math>\beta = \angle ABC</math>. If <math>\alpha</math> | ||
is acute, <math>\beta</math> is obtuse, and we can easily reformulate | is acute, <math>\beta</math> is obtuse, and we can easily reformulate | ||
<math>S2</math> in terms of <math>\beta</math>. | <math>S2</math> in terms of <math>\beta</math>. | ||
− | 4. Below, I will give two solutions. | + | <math>\mathbf{Remark\ 4}</math>. Below, I will give two solutions. |
− | carried out myself. Solution 3 is | + | Solution 2 is one I carried out myself and relies on a |
− | by feliz shown on the web page | + | straightforward computation. Solution 3 (it happens to be |
+ | similar to Solution 2) is inspired by an idea by feliz shown | ||
+ | on the web page | ||
https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h21154p137323 | https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h21154p137323 | ||
− | The author calls | + | The author calls their text a solution, but it is quite |
− | it | + | confused, so I would not call it a good solution. The idea |
− | good | + | though is good and nice, and it yields a nice solution. |
==Solution 2== | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | We can assume <math>a > 1</math>. Indeed, refer to Remark 2 above to | ||
+ | see that if <math>a \le 1</math> there is nothing to prove. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that instead of the statement <math>S1</math> we can consider the | ||
+ | following statement <math>S1'</math>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>S1'</math>: the circles of radius <math>1</math> centered at <math>A, B, D</math> cover | ||
+ | <math>\triangle ABD</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is equivalent to <math>S1</math> because of the symmetry between | ||
+ | <math>\triangle ABD</math> and <math>\triangle BCD</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>F</math> be the intersection above <math>AB</math> of the circles of radius | ||
+ | <math>1</math> centered at <math>A, B</math>. The three circles cover <math>\triangle ABD</math> | ||
+ | if an only if <math>F</math> is inside the circle of radius 1 centered at | ||
+ | <math>D</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Prob_1967_1_fig2.png|300px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | This needs an explanation: Let <math>H</math> be the midpoint of <math>BD</math>, and | ||
+ | consider <math>\triangle FHD</math>. All the vertices of this triangle are | ||
+ | in the circle centered at <math>D</math>, so the whole triangle is inside | ||
+ | this circle. It is obvious that <math>\triangle FHB</math> is inside the | ||
+ | circle centered at <math>B</math>, and that <math>\triangle FAD, \triangle FAB</math> | ||
+ | are inside the circles centered at <math>A, B</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will now show that <math>F</math> is inside the circle of radius 1 centered | ||
+ | at <math>D</math> if an only if <math>DF \le 1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The plan is to calculate <math>DF</math> in terms of <math>a, \alpha</math> and impose | ||
+ | this condition. Let <math>FG \perp AB</math>, <math>DE \perp AB</math> and | ||
+ | <math>FF' \parallel GE</math>. From the right triangle <math>\triangle AFG</math> we | ||
+ | have <math>FG = \sqrt{1 - \left( \frac{a}{2} \right)^2} = | ||
+ | \frac{\sqrt{4 - a^2}}{2}</math>. From the right triangle <math>\triangle | ||
+ | DFF'</math> we have | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>DF = \sqrt{(DF')^2 + (FF')^2} = \sqrt{(DE - FG)^2 + (AG - AE)^2} = | ||
+ | \sqrt{\left( \sin \alpha - \frac{\sqrt{4 - a^2}}{2} \right)^2 + | ||
+ | \left( \frac{a}{2} - \cos \alpha \right)^2}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | (Note that here we used the fact that <math>\alpha</math> is acute. These | ||
+ | equalities would look slightly differently otherwise.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now look at the condition <math>DF \le 1</math>, or equivalently <math>DF^2 \le 1</math>. | ||
+ | Making all the computations and simplifications, we have | ||
+ | <math>\sqrt{4 - a^2} \sin \alpha \ge 1 - a \cos \alpha</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now I would like to square both sides. In order to get an | ||
+ | equivalent inequality, we need to know that <math>1 - a \cos \alpha \ge 0</math>. | ||
+ | This follows from the fact that <math>\angle ADB</math> is acute. Indeed, | ||
+ | denote <math>\angle ADB = \beta</math>. From the law of sines in | ||
+ | <math>\triangle ADB</math> we have | ||
+ | <math>\frac{1}{\sin \angle ABD} = \frac{a}{\sin \beta}</math>. Successively | ||
+ | this becomes | ||
+ | <math>\frac{1}{\sin (\pi - \alpha - \beta)} = \frac{a}{\sin \beta}</math> | ||
+ | or <math>\frac{1}{\sin (\alpha + \beta)} = \frac{a}{\sin \beta}</math> | ||
+ | or <math>(1 - a \cos \alpha) \sin \beta = a \sin \alpha \cos \beta</math>. | ||
+ | From here we see that <math>\beta < \frac{\pi}{2}</math> implies the right | ||
+ | hand side is positive, so <math>1 - a \cos \alpha > 0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Going back to our inequality, we can square both sides, and | ||
+ | after rearranging terms we get that <math>DF \le 1</math> if and only if | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>a^2 - 2a \cos \alpha + (1 - 4 \sin^2 \alpha) \le 0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | View this as an equation of degree <math>2</math> in <math>a</math>. The value of the | ||
+ | polynomial in <math>a</math> is <math>\le 0</math> when <math>a</math> is between its solutions, | ||
+ | that is | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\cos \alpha - \sqrt{3} \sin \alpha \le a \le | ||
+ | \cos \alpha + \sqrt{3} \sin \alpha</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that <math>\cos \alpha - \sqrt{3} \sin \alpha = | ||
+ | 2 \cos \left( \alpha + \frac{\pi}{3} \right)</math>. If | ||
+ | <math>\alpha \in \left( 0, \frac{\pi}{2} \right)</math> then | ||
+ | <math>\left( \alpha + \frac{\pi}{3} \right) \in | ||
+ | \left( \frac{\pi}{3}, \frac{5\pi}{6} \right)</math>, | ||
+ | and it follows that | ||
+ | <math>2 \cos \left( \alpha + \frac{\pi}{3} \right) \le 1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | On the other hand, remember that we are in the case <math>a > 1</math>, | ||
+ | so the left inequality is always true. It follows that | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>DF \le 1</math> (i.e. the three circles of radius <math>1</math> centered at | ||
+ | <math>A, B, D</math> cover <math>\triangle ABD</math>) if an only if | ||
+ | <math>a \le \cos \alpha + \sqrt{3} \sin \alpha</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [Solution by pf02, September 2024] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 3== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This solution is very similar to Solution 2, except that | ||
+ | we choose another point instead of <math>F</math>. This will in fact | ||
+ | simplify the proof. Start like in Solution 2. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can assume <math>a > 1</math>. Indeed, refer to Remark 2 above to | ||
+ | see that if <math>a \le 1</math> there is nothing to prove. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that instead of the statement <math>S1</math> we can consider the | ||
+ | following statement <math>S1'</math>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>S1'</math>: the circles of radius <math>1</math> centered at <math>A, B, D</math> cover | ||
+ | <math>\triangle ABD</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is equivalent to <math>S1</math> because of the symmetry between | ||
+ | <math>\triangle ABD</math> and <math>\triangle BCD</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>O</math> be the center of the circle circumscribed to | ||
+ | <math>\triangle ABD</math>. Let <math>M, N, P</math>, be the midpoints of | ||
+ | <math>AB, AD, BD</math>. The three circles cover <math>\triangle ABD</math> | ||
+ | if an only if <math>O</math> is inside the circle of radius 1 | ||
+ | centered at <math>D</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Prob_1967_1_fig3.png|300px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | This needs an explanation. In fact, since <math>OA = OB = OD</math>, | ||
+ | the point <math>O</math> is inside or on the circle centered at <math>D</math> | ||
+ | if and only if <math>OD \le 1</math>, if and only if <math>O</math> is in or | ||
+ | inside the circles centered at <math>A, B, D</math>. Since | ||
+ | <math>OP \perp BD</math>, we have <math>DP < OD, PB < OB</math>, so the triangles | ||
+ | <math>\triangle OPD, \triangle OPB</math> are inside the circles | ||
+ | centered at <math>D, B</math> respectively. By drawing <math>OA, OM</math> | ||
+ | we can easily verify that the whole triangle is inside | ||
+ | the circles centered at <math>A, D, B</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that in the above argument we used that <math>O</math> is inside | ||
+ | <math>\triangle ABD</math>, which is true because the triangle is acute. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Denote <math>R</math> the radius of the circle circumscribed to | ||
+ | <math>\triangle ABD</math>. From the law of sines, we have | ||
+ | <math>\frac{BD}{\sin \alpha} = 2R</math>, and from the law of | ||
+ | cosines we have <math>BD^2 = 1 + a^2 -2a \cos \alpha</math>. | ||
+ | So <math>R = OD \le 1</math> translates to | ||
+ | <math>\frac{\sqrt{1 + a^2 -2a \cos \alpha}}{2 \sin \alpha} \le 1</math> | ||
+ | Since <math>\sin \alpha > 0</math>, we can simplify this inequality, and | ||
+ | get | ||
+ | <math>a^2 - 2a \cos \alpha + (1 - 4 \sin^2 \alpha) \le 0</math>. | ||
+ | But this is exactly the inequality we encountered in Solution 2, | ||
+ | so proving that this is equivalent to | ||
+ | <math>a \le \cos \alpha + \sqrt{3} \sin \alpha</math> | ||
+ | is identical to what has been done above. | ||
+ | [Solution based on an idea by feliz; see link in Remark 4, or below.] | ||
− | |||
----- | ----- |
Latest revision as of 19:21, 10 November 2024
Contents
Problem
Let be a parallelogram with side lengths
,
, and with
.
If
is acute, prove that the four circles of radius
with centers
,
,
,
cover the parallelogram if and only if
Solution
To start our proof we draw a parallelogram with the requested sides. We notice that by drawing the circles with centers A, B, C, D that the length of must not exceed 2 (the radius for each circle) or the circles will not meet and thus not cover the parallelogram.
To prove our conjecture we draw a parallelogram with and draw a segment
so that
This is the parallelogram which we claim has the maximum length on and the highest value on any one angle.
We now have two triangles inside a parallelogram with lengths and
,
being segment
.
Using the Pythagorean theorem we conclude:
Using trigonometric functions we can compute:
Notice that by applying the and
functions, we can conclude that our angle
To conclude our proof we make sure that our values match the required values for maximum length of
Notice that as decreases, the value of (1) increases beyond 2. We can prove this using the law of sines. Similarly as
increases, the value of (1) decreases below 2, confirming that (1) is only implied when
is acute.
--Bjarnidk 02:16, 17 May 2013 (EDT)
Remarks (added by pf02, September 2024)
. I am sorry to be so harshly critical, but the
solution above is deeply flawed. Not only it has errors, but the
logic is flawed.
It shows that when the parallelogram
is covered by the circles of radius
centered at
, and
the inequality in the problem is true. (Even this is incomplete, while
giving too many, unnecessary details.) (Note that this is not a case
which satisfies the conditions of the problem since
is
right, not acute.)
In the last two lines it gives some reasoning about other values of
which is incomprehensible to this reader.
In one short sentence: this is not a solution.
. The problem itself is mildly flawed. To see this,
denote
the following two statements:
S1: The parallelogram is covered by the four circles of radius
centered at
.
S2: We have .
The problem says that if is acute,
and
are
equivalent, i.e. they imply each other.
Notice that can be rewritten as
.
Now notice that if then S1 is obviously true. See
the picture below:
Also, notice that if and
then
is true as well. Indeed
, so
is
on this interval, so the right hand side
of
is
.
We see that if and
is acute, both
and
are true. We can not say that one implies the other in
the usual meaning of the word "imply": the two statements just
happen to be both true.
If we take then the problem is a genuine problem, and
there is something to prove.
. In the proofs I give below, we will see
where we need that
is acute. We will see that
is needed for the technicalities of
the proof. The fact that
is acute will be needed
at one crucial point in the proof.
In fact, it is possible to modify to a statement
similar to
so that
and
are equivalent without
any assumption on
. I will not go into this, I will
just give a hint: Denote
. If
is acute,
is obtuse, and we can easily reformulate
in terms of
.
. Below, I will give two solutions.
Solution 2 is one I carried out myself and relies on a
straightforward computation. Solution 3 (it happens to be
similar to Solution 2) is inspired by an idea by feliz shown
on the web page
https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h21154p137323
The author calls their text a solution, but it is quite
confused, so I would not call it a good solution. The idea
though is good and nice, and it yields a nice solution.
Solution 2
We can assume . Indeed, refer to Remark 2 above to
see that if
there is nothing to prove.
Note that instead of the statement we can consider the
following statement
:
: the circles of radius
centered at
cover
.
This is equivalent to because of the symmetry between
and
.
Let be the intersection above
of the circles of radius
centered at
. The three circles cover
if an only if
is inside the circle of radius 1 centered at
.
This needs an explanation: Let be the midpoint of
, and
consider
. All the vertices of this triangle are
in the circle centered at
, so the whole triangle is inside
this circle. It is obvious that
is inside the
circle centered at
, and that
are inside the circles centered at
.
We will now show that is inside the circle of radius 1 centered
at
if an only if
.
The plan is to calculate in terms of
and impose
this condition. Let
,
and
. From the right triangle
we
have
. From the right triangle
we have
(Note that here we used the fact that is acute. These
equalities would look slightly differently otherwise.)
Now look at the condition , or equivalently
.
Making all the computations and simplifications, we have
.
Now I would like to square both sides. In order to get an
equivalent inequality, we need to know that .
This follows from the fact that
is acute. Indeed,
denote
. From the law of sines in
we have
. Successively
this becomes
or
or
.
From here we see that
implies the right
hand side is positive, so
.
Going back to our inequality, we can square both sides, and
after rearranging terms we get that if and only if
.
View this as an equation of degree in
. The value of the
polynomial in
is
when
is between its solutions,
that is
.
Note that . If
then
,
and it follows that
.
On the other hand, remember that we are in the case ,
so the left inequality is always true. It follows that
(i.e. the three circles of radius
centered at
cover
) if an only if
.
[Solution by pf02, September 2024]
Solution 3
This solution is very similar to Solution 2, except that
we choose another point instead of . This will in fact
simplify the proof. Start like in Solution 2.
We can assume . Indeed, refer to Remark 2 above to
see that if
there is nothing to prove.
Note that instead of the statement we can consider the
following statement
:
: the circles of radius
centered at
cover
.
This is equivalent to because of the symmetry between
and
.
Let be the center of the circle circumscribed to
. Let
, be the midpoints of
. The three circles cover
if an only if
is inside the circle of radius 1
centered at
.
This needs an explanation. In fact, since ,
the point
is inside or on the circle centered at
if and only if
, if and only if
is in or
inside the circles centered at
. Since
, we have
, so the triangles
are inside the circles
centered at
respectively. By drawing
we can easily verify that the whole triangle is inside
the circles centered at
.
Note that in the above argument we used that is inside
, which is true because the triangle is acute.
Denote the radius of the circle circumscribed to
. From the law of sines, we have
, and from the law of
cosines we have
.
So
translates to
Since , we can simplify this inequality, and
get
.
But this is exactly the inequality we encountered in Solution 2, so proving that this is equivalent to
is identical to what has been done above.
[Solution based on an idea by feliz; see link in Remark 4, or below.]
A solution can also be found here [1]
See Also
1967 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First question |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |