Difference between revisions of "1994 OIM Problems/Problem 1"
(Created page with "== Problem == A natural number <math>n</math> is said to be "''sensible''" if there exists an integer <math>r</math>, with <math>1<r<n-1</math>, such that the representation o...") |
Archieguan (talk | contribs) m (→Solution) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | {{solution}} | + | Lemma: |
+ | Every number that can be expressed as | ||
+ | <cmath> b \cdot \frac{r^d-1}{r-1} , b < r </cmath> | ||
+ | Is a "''sensible''" number as it can be expressed as <math>b\cdots b _ r</math>, where there are <math>d</math> <math>b’s</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Part <math>1:</math> Let us prove that <math>1993</math> cannot be expressed as such. | ||
+ | Notice that <math>1993</math> is a prime, which means that <math>b = 1</math> as it cannot be <math>1993</math> or else <math>r > 1994</math>. | ||
+ | Therefore, we need to prove that there does not exist <math>d,r</math> such that | ||
+ | <cmath> \frac{r^d-1}{r-1} =1993 </cmath> | ||
+ | Assume on the contrary, there exists such <math>d,r</math>. Then we have | ||
+ | <cmath> r^d - 1 = 1993r - 1993 \implies r^d = 1993r - 1992</cmath> | ||
+ | Notice that taking mod<math>(r)</math> results in <math> r \mid 1992</math>. | ||
+ | Notice plugging in some small values, <math>r = 2,3,4,6,8,12,24</math>, they don’t work | ||
+ | <math>1992 \cdot 2 - 1992 = 1994 \neq 2^d</math> | ||
+ | And similarly. | ||
+ | So the next smallest value of <math>r</math> is <math>83</math>, implying that <math>d < 3</math> because | ||
+ | <cmath>\text{when} \hspace{0.2cm} r \geq 45, r^3 > 1993r -1992</cmath> | ||
+ | As <math>r^3</math> grows faster than <math>1992r</math> when <math>r > \sqrt{1992} \implies r \geq 45</math> and when <math>r = 45, 45^3 = 91125 > 87693 = 1993 \cdot 45 - 1992</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | So <math>d = 1,2</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | If <math>d = 1,</math> then <math>1992(r-1) = 0 \implies r = 1</math>, which is not true because <math>r>1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If <math>d = 2,</math> then <math>(r-1)(r-1992) = 0 \implies r = 1,1992</math>, which is not true because <math>1<r<1992</math> | ||
+ | So there is no solution. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Part <math>2: </math> Let us show that <math>1994</math> is sensible. | ||
+ | <math>1994 = 2 \cdot 997 = 2\cdot (996 + 1) = 22_{996}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Comment: any composite number other than <math>p^2</math>, where <math>p</math> is a prime is sensible as <math>n \cdot r = n \cdot (1 + (r-1)) = nn_{r-1}</math> | ||
+ | E.g <math>69 = 3\cdot 23 = 33_{22}</math> | ||
+ | ~Archieguan | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
https://www.oma.org.ar/enunciados/ibe9.htm | https://www.oma.org.ar/enunciados/ibe9.htm |
Latest revision as of 21:30, 22 October 2024
Problem
A natural number is said to be "sensible" if there exists an integer , with , such that the representation of in base has all its digits equal. For example, 62 and 15 are "sensible", since 62 is 222 in base 5 and 15 is 33 in base 4.
Prove that 1993 is NOT "sensible" but 1994 is.
~translated into English by Tomas Diaz. ~orders@tomasdiaz.com
Solution
Lemma: Every number that can be expressed as Is a "sensible" number as it can be expressed as , where there are
Part Let us prove that cannot be expressed as such. Notice that is a prime, which means that as it cannot be or else . Therefore, we need to prove that there does not exist such that Assume on the contrary, there exists such . Then we have Notice that taking mod results in . Notice plugging in some small values, , they don’t work And similarly. So the next smallest value of is , implying that because As grows faster than when and when
So
If then , which is not true because .
If then , which is not true because So there is no solution.
Part Let us show that is sensible.
Comment: any composite number other than , where is a prime is sensible as E.g ~Archieguan