Difference between revisions of "1966 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(→Solution) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Let <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> be the lengths of the sides of a triangle, and <math> \alpha,\beta,\gamma </math> respectively, the angles opposite these sides. | + | Let <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math> be the lengths of the sides of a triangle, and <math> \alpha,\beta,\gamma </math> respectively, the angles opposite these sides. Prove that if |
− | <cmath> a+b=\tan{\frac{\gamma}{2}}(a\tan{\alpha}+b\tan{\beta}) </cmath> | + | <cmath> a+b=\tan{\frac{\gamma}{2}}(a\tan{\alpha}+b\tan{\beta}), </cmath> |
+ | |||
+ | the triangle is isosceles. | ||
− | |||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
+ | |||
We'll prove that the triangle is isosceles with <math>a=b</math>. | We'll prove that the triangle is isosceles with <math>a=b</math>. | ||
We'll prove that <math>a=b</math>. Assume by way of contradiction WLOG that <math>a>b</math>. | We'll prove that <math>a=b</math>. Assume by way of contradiction WLOG that <math>a>b</math>. | ||
Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
Now, <math>\pi >\alpha -\beta >0</math> (as <math>\alpha+\beta +\gamma = \pi</math> and the angles are positive), <math>\tan \frac{\alpha -\beta}{2}\neq 0</math>, and furthermore, <math>\tan \frac{\alpha+\beta}{2}>0</math>. By all the above, <cmath>\left(a-b+\tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2}(a\tan\alpha -b\tan \beta) \right)>0</cmath> | Now, <math>\pi >\alpha -\beta >0</math> (as <math>\alpha+\beta +\gamma = \pi</math> and the angles are positive), <math>\tan \frac{\alpha -\beta}{2}\neq 0</math>, and furthermore, <math>\tan \frac{\alpha+\beta}{2}>0</math>. By all the above, <cmath>\left(a-b+\tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2}(a\tan\alpha -b\tan \beta) \right)>0</cmath> | ||
Which contradicts our assumption, thus <math>a\leq b</math>. By the symmetry of the condition, using the same arguments, <math>a\geq b</math>. Hence <math>a=b</math>. | Which contradicts our assumption, thus <math>a\leq b</math>. By the symmetry of the condition, using the same arguments, <math>a\geq b</math>. Hence <math>a=b</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | First, we'll prove that both <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math> are acute. | ||
+ | At least one of them has to be acute because these are angles | ||
+ | of a triangle. We can assume that <math>\alpha</math> is acute. We want | ||
+ | to show that <math>\beta</math> is acute as well. For a proof by | ||
+ | contradiction, assume <math>\beta \ge \frac{\pi}{2}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | From the hypothesis, it follows that | ||
+ | <math>(a + b) \tan \frac{\alpha + \beta}{2} = a \tan \alpha + b \tan \beta</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | From <math>\alpha < \beta</math> it follows that <math>a < b</math>. So, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | (Solution by pf02, September 2024) | ||
+ | |||
+ | TO BE CONTINUED. SAVING MID WAY SO I DON'T LOOSE WORK DONE SO FAR. | ||
+ | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{IMO box|year=1966|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | {{IMO box|year=1966|num-b=1|num-a=3}} |
Revision as of 23:18, 28 September 2024
Let ,
, and
be the lengths of the sides of a triangle, and
respectively, the angles opposite these sides. Prove that if
the triangle is isosceles.
Solution
We'll prove that the triangle is isosceles with .
We'll prove that
. Assume by way of contradiction WLOG that
.
First notice that as
then and the identity
our equation becomes:
Using the identity
and inserting this into the above equation we get:
Now, since
and the definitions of
being part of the definition of a triangle,
.
Now,
(as
and the angles are positive),
, and furthermore,
. By all the above,
Which contradicts our assumption, thus
. By the symmetry of the condition, using the same arguments,
. Hence
.
Solution 2
First, we'll prove that both and
are acute.
At least one of them has to be acute because these are angles
of a triangle. We can assume that
is acute. We want
to show that
is acute as well. For a proof by
contradiction, assume
.
From the hypothesis, it follows that
.
From it follows that
. So,
(Solution by pf02, September 2024)
TO BE CONTINUED. SAVING MID WAY SO I DON'T LOOSE WORK DONE SO FAR.
See Also
1966 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |