Difference between revisions of "2024 USAJMO Problems/Problem 3"
(Created page with "=== Problem === Let <math>a(n)</math> be the sequence defined by <math>a(1)=2</math> and <math>a(n+1)=(a(n))^{n+1}-1</math> for each integer <math>n\geq1</math>. Suppose that...") |
m (→Solution 1) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | __TOC__ | |
+ | |||
+ | == Problem == | ||
Let <math>a(n)</math> be the sequence defined by <math>a(1)=2</math> and <math>a(n+1)=(a(n))^{n+1}-1</math> for each integer <math>n\geq1</math>. Suppose that <math>p>2</math> is prime and <math>k</math> is a positive integer. Prove that some term of the sequence <math>a(n)</math> is divisible by <math>p^k</math>. | Let <math>a(n)</math> be the sequence defined by <math>a(1)=2</math> and <math>a(n+1)=(a(n))^{n+1}-1</math> for each integer <math>n\geq1</math>. Suppose that <math>p>2</math> is prime and <math>k</math> is a positive integer. Prove that some term of the sequence <math>a(n)</math> is divisible by <math>p^k</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 1 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lemma <math>1</math>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Given a prime <math>p</math>, a positive integer <math>k</math>, and an even <math>m</math> such that <math>p^k|a(m)</math>, we must have that <math>p^{k+1}|a(m+2)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Proof of Lemma <math>1</math>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>a(m+1)\equiv (a(m))^{m+1}-1\equiv -1 \mod p^{k+1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then, <math>a(m+2)\equiv (a(m+1))^{m+2}-1\equiv (-1)^{m+2}-1\equiv 0 \mod p^{k+1}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, by induction, if there exists an even integer <math>m</math> such that <math>p|a(m)</math>, then for all integers <math>k</math>, <math>p^k|a(m+2k-2)</math>, so we are done if there exists an even <math>m</math> such that <math>p|a(m)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Now, consider the case where there is some prime <math>p>2</math> such that there are no even integers <math>m</math> such that <math>p|a(m)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lemma <math>2</math>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | In this case, we must have that <math>p|a(m)</math> if <math>m\equiv -1 \mod p-1</math> for all integers <math>m</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Proof of Lemma <math>2</math>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Suppose for the sake of contradiction that there exists some <math>m</math> such that <math>m\equiv -1\mod p-1</math> and <math>p</math> does not divide <math>a(m)</math>. Then, we have <math>a(m+1)\equiv (a(m))^{m+1}-1\equiv 1-1\equiv 0\mod p</math>, by Fermat's Little Theorem. Since for all <math>p>2</math>, <math>p-1</math> is even, then <math>m+1</math> would be even. However this results in a contradiction. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then, we get that if <math>m\equiv -1\mod p-1</math>, then <math>0\equiv a(m)\equiv (a(m-1))^m-1\mod p\implies (a(m-1))^{m+1}\equiv 1\equiv a(m-1)\mod p</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then, by LTE, <math>v_p(a(m))=v_p((a(m-1))^m-1)=v_p(a(m-1)-1)+v_p(m)>v_p(m)</math>. Since <math>\gcd(p-1,p)=1</math>, then <math>\gcd(p-1,p^k)=1</math> for all positive integers <math>k</math>, so then by Chinese Remainder Theorem there exists integers <math>m</math> such that <math>m\equiv -1\mod p-1</math> and <math>m\equiv 0\mod p^k</math>, so we are done <math>\square</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Remark: I think this is a very cool NT problem. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | -bronzetruck2016 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==See Also== | ||
+ | {{USAJMO newbox|year=2024|num-b=2|num-a=4}} | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 20:42, 19 July 2024
Contents
Problem
Let be the sequence defined by and for each integer . Suppose that is prime and is a positive integer. Prove that some term of the sequence is divisible by .
Solution 1
Lemma :
Given a prime , a positive integer , and an even such that , we must have that .
Proof of Lemma :
Then,
Therefore, by induction, if there exists an even integer such that , then for all integers , , so we are done if there exists an even such that .
Now, consider the case where there is some prime such that there are no even integers such that .
Lemma :
In this case, we must have that if for all integers .
Proof of Lemma :
Suppose for the sake of contradiction that there exists some such that and does not divide . Then, we have , by Fermat's Little Theorem. Since for all , is even, then would be even. However this results in a contradiction.
Then, we get that if , then .
Then, by LTE, . Since , then for all positive integers , so then by Chinese Remainder Theorem there exists integers such that and , so we are done
Remark: I think this is a very cool NT problem.
-bronzetruck2016
See Also
2024 USAJMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAJMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.