Difference between revisions of "Karamata's Inequality"
Etmetalakret (talk | contribs) m |
(→Proof) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Proof== | ==Proof== | ||
We will first use an important fact: | We will first use an important fact: | ||
− | < | + | If <math>f(x)</math> is convex over the interval <math>(a, b)</math>, then <math>\forall a\leq x_1\leq x_2 \leq b</math> and <math>\Gamma(x, y):=\frac{f(y)-f(x)}{y-x}</math>, <math>\Gamma(x_1, x)\leq \Gamma (x_2, x)</math> |
This is proven by taking casework on <math>x\neq x_1,x_2</math>. If <math>x<x_1</math>, then | This is proven by taking casework on <math>x\neq x_1,x_2</math>. If <math>x<x_1</math>, then | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<cmath>\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(a_i) - \sum_{i=1}^{n}f(b_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(a_i)-f(b_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}c_i(a_i-b_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}c_i(A_i-A_{i-1}-B_i+B_{i+1})</cmath><cmath>\sum_{i=1}^{n}c_i(A_i-A_{i-1}-B_i+B_{i+1})=\sum_{i=1}^{n}c_i(A_i-B_i) - \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_{i+1}(A_i-B_i)=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_i(A_i-B_i) - \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_{i+1}(A_i-B_i)</cmath><cmath>\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_i(A_i-B_i) - \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_{i+1}(A_i-B_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}(c_i-c_{i+1})(A_i-B_i)\geq 0</cmath>. | <cmath>\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(a_i) - \sum_{i=1}^{n}f(b_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(a_i)-f(b_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}c_i(a_i-b_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}c_i(A_i-A_{i-1}-B_i+B_{i+1})</cmath><cmath>\sum_{i=1}^{n}c_i(A_i-A_{i-1}-B_i+B_{i+1})=\sum_{i=1}^{n}c_i(A_i-B_i) - \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_{i+1}(A_i-B_i)=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_i(A_i-B_i) - \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_{i+1}(A_i-B_i)</cmath><cmath>\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_i(A_i-B_i) - \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}c_{i+1}(A_i-B_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}(c_i-c_{i+1})(A_i-B_i)\geq 0</cmath>. | ||
− | Therefore, | + | Therefore, <cmath>\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(a_i) \geq \sum_{i=1}^{n}f(b_i)</cmath> |
− | <cmath>\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(a_i) \geq \sum_{i=1}^{n}f(b_i)</cmath> | + | |
+ | Thus, we have proven Karamata's Theorem. | ||
+ | |||
− | |||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:39, 28 March 2024
Karamata's Inequality states that if majorizes and is a convex function, then
Proof
We will first use an important fact: If is convex over the interval , then and ,
This is proven by taking casework on . If , then
A similar argument shows for other values of .
Now, define a sequence such that:
Define the sequences such that and similarly.
Then, assuming and similarily with the 's, we get that . Now, we know: .
Therefore,
Thus, we have proven Karamata's Theorem.
This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.