Difference between revisions of "Mock AIME 6 2006-2007 Problems/Problem 5"
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
<math>(k-1)10+3 \le n-2007 \le (k-1)10+2</math>, and <math>4+k^2 \le S(n) \le 85+k^2</math> | <math>(k-1)10+3 \le n-2007 \le (k-1)10+2</math>, and <math>4+k^2 \le S(n) \le 85+k^2</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | At <math>k=2</math>, <math>10(k-1)+3=193>85+k^2>89</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | At <math>k=3</math>, <math>10(k-1)+3=293>85+k^2>94</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | At <math>k=4</math>, <math>10(k-1)+3=393>85+k^2>101</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | At <math>k=5</math>, <math>10(k-1)+3=493>85+k^2>110</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | At <math>k=6</math>, <math>10(k-1)+3=593>85+k^2>121</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | At <math>k=7</math>, <math>10(k-1)+3=693>85+k^2>134</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | At <math>k=8</math>, <math>10(k-1)+3=793>85+k^2>149</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | At <math>k=9</math>, <math>10(k-1)+3=893>85+k^2>166</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>10(k-1)+3 > 85+k^2</math>, for <math>2 \le k \le 9</math>, then <math>n-2007\not\le S(n)</math> and there is '''no possible <math>n</math>''' when <math>n \ge 2120</math> when combined with the previous cases. | ||
Revision as of 14:55, 24 November 2023
Problem
Let be the sum of the squares of the digits of . How many positive integers satisfy the inequality ?
Solution
We start by rearranging the inequality the following way:
and compare the possible values for the left hand side and the right hand side of this inequality.
Case 1: has 5 digits or more.
Let = number of digits of n.
Then as a function of d,
, and
, and
when ,
Since for , then and there is no possible when has 5 or more digits.
Case 2: has 4 digits and
, and
, and
Since , then and there is no possible when has 4 digits and .
Case 3:
Let be the 2nd digit of
, and
, and
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
Since , for , then and there is no possible when when combined with the previous cases.
Case 4:
Let be the 3rd digit of
, and
, and
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
At , .
Since , for , then and there is no possible when when combined with the previous cases.
...ongoing writing of solution...
~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com