Difference between revisions of "2012 USAMO Problems/Problem 6"
(→Note:) |
(→Note:) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
since it will be | since it will be | ||
<cmath>x_1 + x_2 + ... + x_n </cmath> | <cmath>x_1 + x_2 + ... + x_n </cmath> | ||
− | for any choice of A we pick, it will have to be greater than <math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}</math> which means we can either pick 0 negative <math>x_m</math> or <math>\frac{ | + | for any choice of A we pick, it will have to be greater than <math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}</math> which means we can either pick 0 negative <math>x_m</math> or <math>j-1</math> negatives for j positive terms. Since we also have that there are <math>\frac{n}{2}</math> positive and negative terms for evens. Which then gives us: |
<cmath>\sum_{k=1}^{\frac{n}{2}} \binom{\frac{n}{2}}{k}\sum_{i=0}^{k-1} \binom{\frac{n}{2}}{i}</cmath> | <cmath>\sum_{k=1}^{\frac{n}{2}} \binom{\frac{n}{2}}{k}\sum_{i=0}^{k-1} \binom{\frac{n}{2}}{i}</cmath> | ||
and | and | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Thus, we may say that this holds to be true for all <math>n \ge 2</math> since <math>n2^{n-3}</math> grows faster than the sum. Note that equality holds when <math>S_A \in \{\lambda,0,-\lambda\}</math> for all i which occurs when <math>x_i= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},0,....</math> and <math>\lambda = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math> since <math>S_A=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math> is the only choice for <math>S_A \ge \lambda</math> | Thus, we may say that this holds to be true for all <math>n \ge 2</math> since <math>n2^{n-3}</math> grows faster than the sum. Note that equality holds when <math>S_A \in \{\lambda,0,-\lambda\}</math> for all i which occurs when <math>x_i= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},0,....</math> and <math>\lambda = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math> since <math>S_A=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math> is the only choice for <math>S_A \ge \lambda</math> | ||
<math>\blacksquare</math> | <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
==Note:== | ==Note:== | ||
The proof to the last inequality is as follows: | The proof to the last inequality is as follows: |
Latest revision as of 12:37, 21 June 2023
Contents
Problem
For integer , let , , , be real numbers satisfying For each subset , define (If is the empty set, then .)
Prove that for any positive number , the number of sets satisfying is at most . For what choices of , , , , does equality hold?
Solution 1
For convenience, let .
Note that , so the sum of the taken two at a time is . Now consider the following sum:
Since , it follows that at most sets have .
Now note that . It follows that at most half of the such that are positive. This shows that at most sets satisfy .
Note that if equality holds, every subset of has . It immediately follows that is a permutation of . Since we know that , we have that .
Solution 2
Let It is evident that for evens because of the second equation and for odds(one term will be 0 to maintain the first condition). We may then try and get an expression for the maximum number of sets that satisfy this which occur when : since it will be for any choice of A we pick, it will have to be greater than which means we can either pick 0 negative or negatives for j positive terms. Since we also have that there are positive and negative terms for evens. Which then gives us: and For odd values, let it be the same as the last even valued sequence where n is even(i.e. the same as the sequence before it but with an extra 0 in one of the spots). Then, the following is apparent: Thus, we may say that this holds to be true for all since grows faster than the sum. Note that equality holds when for all i which occurs when and since is the only choice for
Note:
The proof to the last inequality is as follows: First we may rewrite this as being: Thus, (the second equation is because the sum of the binomial coefficient is ) Since for all and for all and , it is apparent that: must be true for all (because if we rewrite this we get .) For all however, we may use some logic to first layout a plan. Since for and , , we may say that whole sum will be less than because for all Plugging this inequality back in gives us: because of the fact that
See Also
2012 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 5 |
Last Problem | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.