Difference between revisions of "1991 USAMO Problems/Problem 1"
Raidermath6 (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
(→Alternate Solution: added note) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
+ | ===Solution 1=== | ||
+ | <asy> | ||
+ | import olympiad; | ||
+ | |||
+ | pair A, B, C, D, extensionAC; | ||
+ | real angleABC; | ||
+ | path braceBC; | ||
+ | |||
+ | A = (0, 0); | ||
+ | B = (2, 0); | ||
+ | D = (1, .5); | ||
+ | |||
+ | angleABC = atan(.5); | ||
+ | |||
+ | //y = 4x/3 and x+2y = 2 (sides AC and BC, respectively) intersect here: | ||
+ | C = (6/11, 8/11); | ||
+ | |||
+ | braceBC = brace(C, B, .1); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$\mathsf{A}$", A, W); | ||
+ | label("$\mathsf{B}$", B, E); | ||
+ | label("$\mathsf{C}$", C, N); | ||
+ | label("$\mathsf{D}$", D, S); | ||
+ | label("$\mathsf{a}$", braceBC, NE); | ||
+ | label("$\mathsf{b}$", A--C, NW); | ||
+ | label("$\mathsf{c}$", A--B, S); | ||
+ | label("$\mathsf{x}$", A--D, N); | ||
+ | |||
+ | draw(A--B--C--cycle); | ||
+ | draw(A--D); | ||
+ | draw(anglemark(C, B, A)); | ||
+ | draw(anglemark(B, A, D)); | ||
+ | draw(anglemark(D, A, C)); | ||
+ | draw(braceBC); | ||
+ | </asy> | ||
+ | (diagram by integralarefun) | ||
+ | |||
After drawing the triangle, also draw the [[angle bisector]] of <math>\angle A</math>, and let it intersect <math>\overline{BC}</math> at <math>D</math>. Notice that <math>\triangle ADC\sim \triangle BAC</math>, and let <math>AD=x</math>. Now from similarity, | After drawing the triangle, also draw the [[angle bisector]] of <math>\angle A</math>, and let it intersect <math>\overline{BC}</math> at <math>D</math>. Notice that <math>\triangle ADC\sim \triangle BAC</math>, and let <math>AD=x</math>. Now from similarity, | ||
<cmath>x=\frac{bc}{a}</cmath> | <cmath>x=\frac{bc}{a}</cmath> | ||
Line 11: | Line 48: | ||
so all sets of side lengths which satisfy the conditions also meet the boxed condition. | so all sets of side lengths which satisfy the conditions also meet the boxed condition. | ||
− | Notice that <math>\text{gcd}(a, b, c)=1</math> or else we can form a triangle by dividing <math>a, b, c</math> by their [[greatest common divisor]] to get smaller integer side lengths, contradicting the perimeter minimality. Since <math>a</math> is squared, <math>b</math> must also be a square because if it isn't, then <math>b</math> must share a common factor with <math>b+c</math>, meaning it also shares a common factor with <math>c</math>, which means <math>a, b, c</math> share a common factor | + | Notice that <math>\text{gcd}(a, b, c)=1</math> or else we can form a triangle by dividing <math>a, b, c</math> by their [[greatest common divisor]] to get smaller integer side lengths, contradicting the perimeter minimality. Since <math>a</math> is squared, <math>b</math> must also be a square because if it isn't, then <math>b</math> must share a common factor with <math>b+c</math>, meaning it also shares a common factor with <math>c</math>, which means <math>a, b, c</math> share a common factor—a contradiction. Thus we let <math>b = x^2, b+c = y^2</math>, so <math>a = xy</math>, and we want the minimal pair <math>(x,y)</math>. |
By the [[Law of Cosines]], | By the [[Law of Cosines]], | ||
Line 18: | Line 55: | ||
Substituting <math>a^2 = b^2 + bc</math> yields <math>\cos B = \frac{b+c}{2a} = \frac{y}{2x}</math>. Since <math>\angle C > 90^{\circ}</math>, <math>0^{\circ} < \angle B < 30^{\circ} \Longrightarrow \sqrt{3} < \frac{y}{x} < 2</math>. For <math>x \le 3</math> there are no integer solutions. For <math>x = 4</math>, we have <math>y = 7</math> that works, so the side lengths are <math>(a, b, c)=(28, 16, 33)</math> and the minimal perimeter is <math>\boxed{77}</math>. | Substituting <math>a^2 = b^2 + bc</math> yields <math>\cos B = \frac{b+c}{2a} = \frac{y}{2x}</math>. Since <math>\angle C > 90^{\circ}</math>, <math>0^{\circ} < \angle B < 30^{\circ} \Longrightarrow \sqrt{3} < \frac{y}{x} < 2</math>. For <math>x \le 3</math> there are no integer solutions. For <math>x = 4</math>, we have <math>y = 7</math> that works, so the side lengths are <math>(a, b, c)=(28, 16, 33)</math> and the minimal perimeter is <math>\boxed{77}</math>. | ||
− | ==Alternate Solution== | + | ===Alternate Solution=== |
In <math>\triangle ABC</math> let <math>\angle B = \beta, \angle A = 2\beta, \angle C = 180^{\circ} - 3\beta</math>. From the law of sines, we have | In <math>\triangle ABC</math> let <math>\angle B = \beta, \angle A = 2\beta, \angle C = 180^{\circ} - 3\beta</math>. From the law of sines, we have | ||
<cmath> \frac{a}{\sin 2\beta} = \frac{b}{\sin \beta} = \frac{c} {\sin (180^{\circ} - 3\beta)} = \frac{c}{\sin 3\beta}</cmath> | <cmath> \frac{a}{\sin 2\beta} = \frac{b}{\sin \beta} = \frac{c} {\sin (180^{\circ} - 3\beta)} = \frac{c}{\sin 3\beta}</cmath> | ||
Line 34: | Line 71: | ||
We find that to satisfy the conditions for an obtuse triangle, <math>\beta \in (0^\circ, 30^\circ)</math> and therefore <math>\gamma \in \left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}, 1\right)</math>. | We find that to satisfy the conditions for an obtuse triangle, <math>\beta \in (0^\circ, 30^\circ)</math> and therefore <math>\gamma \in \left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}, 1\right)</math>. | ||
− | The rational number with minimum denominator (in order to minimize scaling to obtain integer solutions) above <math> \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2 | + | The rational number with minimum denominator (in order to minimize scaling to obtain integer solutions) above <math> \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}</math> is <math>\frac{7}{8}</math>, which also has a denominator divisible by 2 (to take advantage of the coefficients of 2 and 4 in the ratio and further minimize scaling). |
Inserting <math>\gamma = \frac{7}{8}</math> into the ratio, we find <math>b : a : c = 1 : \frac{7}{4} : \frac{33}{16}</math>. When scaled minimally to obtain integer side lengths, we find | Inserting <math>\gamma = \frac{7}{8}</math> into the ratio, we find <math>b : a : c = 1 : \frac{7}{4} : \frac{33}{16}</math>. When scaled minimally to obtain integer side lengths, we find | ||
Line 40: | Line 77: | ||
and that the perimeter is <math>\boxed{77}</math>. | and that the perimeter is <math>\boxed{77}</math>. | ||
− | == See | + | (note by integralarefun: The part of the solution about finding <math>\gamma</math> is not rigorous and would likely require further proof in an actual test.) |
+ | |||
+ | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == See Also == | ||
{{USAMO box|year=1991|before=First question|num-a=2}} | {{USAMO box|year=1991|before=First question|num-a=2}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} | ||
[[Category:Olympiad Geometry Problems]] | [[Category:Olympiad Geometry Problems]] |
Latest revision as of 07:58, 6 May 2023
Problem
In triangle , angle is twice angle , angle is obtuse, and the three side lengths are integers. Determine, with proof, the minimum possible perimeter.
Solution
Solution 1
(diagram by integralarefun)
After drawing the triangle, also draw the angle bisector of , and let it intersect at . Notice that , and let . Now from similarity, However, from the angle bisector theorem, we have but is isosceles, so so all sets of side lengths which satisfy the conditions also meet the boxed condition.
Notice that or else we can form a triangle by dividing by their greatest common divisor to get smaller integer side lengths, contradicting the perimeter minimality. Since is squared, must also be a square because if it isn't, then must share a common factor with , meaning it also shares a common factor with , which means share a common factor—a contradiction. Thus we let , so , and we want the minimal pair .
By the Law of Cosines,
Substituting yields . Since , . For there are no integer solutions. For , we have that works, so the side lengths are and the minimal perimeter is .
Alternate Solution
In let . From the law of sines, we have Thus the ratio We can simplify Likewise, Letting , rewrite
We find that to satisfy the conditions for an obtuse triangle, and therefore .
The rational number with minimum denominator (in order to minimize scaling to obtain integer solutions) above is , which also has a denominator divisible by 2 (to take advantage of the coefficients of 2 and 4 in the ratio and further minimize scaling).
Inserting into the ratio, we find . When scaled minimally to obtain integer side lengths, we find and that the perimeter is .
(note by integralarefun: The part of the solution about finding is not rigorous and would likely require further proof in an actual test.)
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
1991 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by First question |
Followed by Problem 2 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.