Difference between revisions of "1991 USAMO Problems/Problem 1"
(→Solution 1: side labels) |
(→Alternate Solution: added note) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
pair A, B, C, D, extensionAC; | pair A, B, C, D, extensionAC; | ||
real angleABC; | real angleABC; | ||
+ | path braceBC; | ||
A = (0, 0); | A = (0, 0); | ||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
//y = 4x/3 and x+2y = 2 (sides AC and BC, respectively) intersect here: | //y = 4x/3 and x+2y = 2 (sides AC and BC, respectively) intersect here: | ||
C = (6/11, 8/11); | C = (6/11, 8/11); | ||
+ | |||
+ | braceBC = brace(C, B, .1); | ||
label("$\mathsf{A}$", A, W); | label("$\mathsf{A}$", A, W); | ||
Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
label("$\mathsf{C}$", C, N); | label("$\mathsf{C}$", C, N); | ||
label("$\mathsf{D}$", D, S); | label("$\mathsf{D}$", D, S); | ||
− | label("$\mathsf{a}$", | + | label("$\mathsf{a}$", braceBC, NE); |
label("$\mathsf{b}$", A--C, NW); | label("$\mathsf{b}$", A--C, NW); | ||
label("$\mathsf{c}$", A--B, S); | label("$\mathsf{c}$", A--B, S); | ||
Line 33: | Line 36: | ||
draw(anglemark(B, A, D)); | draw(anglemark(B, A, D)); | ||
draw(anglemark(D, A, C)); | draw(anglemark(D, A, C)); | ||
+ | draw(braceBC); | ||
</asy> | </asy> | ||
(diagram by integralarefun) | (diagram by integralarefun) | ||
Line 72: | Line 76: | ||
<cmath> b, a, c = 16, 28, 33 </cmath> | <cmath> b, a, c = 16, 28, 33 </cmath> | ||
and that the perimeter is <math>\boxed{77}</math>. | and that the perimeter is <math>\boxed{77}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | (note by integralarefun: The part of the solution about finding <math>\gamma</math> is not rigorous and would likely require further proof in an actual test.) | ||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} |
Latest revision as of 07:58, 6 May 2023
Problem
In triangle , angle is twice angle , angle is obtuse, and the three side lengths are integers. Determine, with proof, the minimum possible perimeter.
Solution
Solution 1
(diagram by integralarefun)
After drawing the triangle, also draw the angle bisector of , and let it intersect at . Notice that , and let . Now from similarity, However, from the angle bisector theorem, we have but is isosceles, so so all sets of side lengths which satisfy the conditions also meet the boxed condition.
Notice that or else we can form a triangle by dividing by their greatest common divisor to get smaller integer side lengths, contradicting the perimeter minimality. Since is squared, must also be a square because if it isn't, then must share a common factor with , meaning it also shares a common factor with , which means share a common factor—a contradiction. Thus we let , so , and we want the minimal pair .
By the Law of Cosines,
Substituting yields . Since , . For there are no integer solutions. For , we have that works, so the side lengths are and the minimal perimeter is .
Alternate Solution
In let . From the law of sines, we have Thus the ratio We can simplify Likewise, Letting , rewrite
We find that to satisfy the conditions for an obtuse triangle, and therefore .
The rational number with minimum denominator (in order to minimize scaling to obtain integer solutions) above is , which also has a denominator divisible by 2 (to take advantage of the coefficients of 2 and 4 in the ratio and further minimize scaling).
Inserting into the ratio, we find . When scaled minimally to obtain integer side lengths, we find and that the perimeter is .
(note by integralarefun: The part of the solution about finding is not rigorous and would likely require further proof in an actual test.)
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
1991 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by First question |
Followed by Problem 2 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.