Difference between revisions of "Newton's Inequality"
m (Newton's Inequality moved to Newton's inequality) |
Turtleman64 (talk | contribs) m (→Background) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
''Proof.'' | ''Proof.'' | ||
− | We consider the [[derivative]] of <math> P(t) = \prod_{i=1}^ | + | We consider the [[derivative]] of <math> P(t) = \prod_{i=1}^m (t+x_i) </math>. The roots of <math>P </math> are <math> -x_1, \ldots, -x_m </math>. Without loss of generality, we assume that the <math>x_i </math> increase as <math>i </math> increases. Now for any <math>i \in \{1, m-1\} </math>, <math>P'(t) </math> must have a root between <math>x_i </math> and <math>x_{i+1} </math> by [[Rolle's theorem]] if <math>x_i \neq x_{i+1} </math>, and if <math> x_i = x_{i+1} = \cdots = x_{i+k} </math>, then <math>x_{i} </math> is a root of <math>P </math> <math>k+1 </math> times, so it must be a root of <math>P' </math> <math>k </math> times. It follows that <math>P' </math> must have <math>m-1 </math> non-positive, real roots, i.e., for some non-negative reals <math> x'_1, \ldots, x'_{m-1} </math>, |
<center> | <center> | ||
<math> {} | <math> {} | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
which holds by the [[rearrangement inequality]]. | which holds by the [[rearrangement inequality]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''Proof: without calculus'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will proceed by induction on <math>n</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For <math>n =2</math>, the inequality just reduces to AM-GM inequality. | ||
+ | Now suppose that for <math>n =m-1</math> some positive integer <math>m\ge 3</math> the inequality holds. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>x_1</math>, <math>x_2</math>, <math>\ldots</math>, <math>x_m</math> be non-negative numbers and <math>d_k</math> be the symmetric averages of them. | ||
+ | Let <math>d'_k</math> be the symmetric averages of <math>x_1</math>, <math>\ldots</math>, <math>x_{m-1}</math>. | ||
+ | Note that <math>d_k = \frac{n-k}{n} {d'}_k + \frac{k}{n} {d'}_{k-1} x_m</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | d_{k-1}d_{k+1} = \left(\frac{n-k+1}{n} {d'}_{k-1} + \frac{k-1}{n} {d'}_{k-2} x_m \right)\left(\frac{n-k-1}{n} {d'}_{k+1} + \frac{k+1}{n} {d'}_k x_m \right) | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | = \frac{(n-k+1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}{d'}_{k+1} + \frac{(k-1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-2} {d'}_{k+1} x_m | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | + \frac{(n-k+1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}{d'}_k x_m + \frac{(k-1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-2}{d'}_k x_m^2 | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \le \frac{(n-k+1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_k^2 + \frac{(k-1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-2} {d'}_{k+1} x_m | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | + \frac{(n-k+1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}{d'}_k x_m + \frac{(k-1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}^2 x_m^2 | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \le \frac{(n-k+1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_k^2 + \frac{(k-1)(n-k-1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1} {d'}_{k} x_m | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | + \frac{(n-k+1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}{d'}_k x_m + \frac{(k-1)(k+1)}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}^2 x_m^2 | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | = \frac{(n-k)^2}{n^2} {d'}_k^2 + \frac{2(n-k)k}{n^2} {d'}_k {d'}_{k-1} x_m +\frac{k^2}{n^2} {d'}_{k-1}^2 x_m^2 - \left(\frac{d_k}{n} - \frac{d_{k-1}x_m}{n}\right)^2 | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \le \left(\frac{n-k}{n} {d'}_k + \frac{k}{n} {d'}_{k-1} x_m \right)^2 = d_k^2 | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | By induction this completes the proof. | ||
== See Also == | == See Also == | ||
− | |||
* [[Inequality]] | * [[Inequality]] | ||
+ | * [[Maclaurin's Inequality]] | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Algebra]] |
− | + | [[Category:Inequalities]] | |
− | [[Category: |
Latest revision as of 03:05, 28 January 2023
Contents
Background
For , we define the symmetric sum to be the coefficient of in the polynomial (see Viete's sums). We define the symmetric average to be .
Statement
For non-negative and ,
,
with equality exactly when all the are equal.
Proof
Lemma. For real , there exist real with the same symmetric averages .
Proof. We consider the derivative of . The roots of are . Without loss of generality, we assume that the increase as increases. Now for any , must have a root between and by Rolle's theorem if , and if , then is a root of times, so it must be a root of times. It follows that must have non-positive, real roots, i.e., for some non-negative reals ,
.
It follows that the symmetric sum for is , so the symmetric average .
Thus to prove Newton's theorem, it is sufficient to prove
for any . Since this is a homogenous inequality, we may normalize it so that . The inequality then becomes
.
Expanding the left side, we see that this is
.
But this is clearly equivalent to
,
which holds by the rearrangement inequality.
Proof: without calculus
We will proceed by induction on .
For , the inequality just reduces to AM-GM inequality. Now suppose that for some positive integer the inequality holds.
Let , , , be non-negative numbers and be the symmetric averages of them. Let be the symmetric averages of , , . Note that .
By induction this completes the proof.