Difference between revisions of "1985 AJHSME Problems/Problem 7"
m (→Solution 1) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<math>\text{(A)}\ 34 \qquad \text{(B)}\ 35 \qquad \text{(C)}\ 36 \qquad \text{(D)}\ 37 \qquad \text{(E)}\ 38</math> | <math>\text{(A)}\ 34 \qquad \text{(B)}\ 35 \qquad \text{(C)}\ 36 \qquad \text{(D)}\ 37 \qquad \text{(E)}\ 38</math> | ||
− | + | ==Solution 1== | |
− | |||
− | |||
The best way to solve this problem is to find patterns and to utilize them to our advantage. For example, we can't really do anything without knowing how many squares there are in the 37th row. But who wants to continue the diagram for 37 rows? And what if the problem said 100,000th row? It'll still be possible - but not if your method is to continue the diagram... | The best way to solve this problem is to find patterns and to utilize them to our advantage. For example, we can't really do anything without knowing how many squares there are in the 37th row. But who wants to continue the diagram for 37 rows? And what if the problem said 100,000th row? It'll still be possible - but not if your method is to continue the diagram... | ||
Line 32: | Line 30: | ||
36 is <math>\boxed{\text{C}}</math> | 36 is <math>\boxed{\text{C}}</math> | ||
− | + | ==Solution 2== | |
Note that each row adds one black and one white square to the end of the previous one, and then shifts the new row over a little. Since the first row had no black squares, the number of black squares in any row is one less than the row number. | Note that each row adds one black and one white square to the end of the previous one, and then shifts the new row over a little. Since the first row had no black squares, the number of black squares in any row is one less than the row number. | ||
Now that this has been established, we just have <math>37-1=36\rightarrow \boxed{\text{C}}</math> | Now that this has been established, we just have <math>37-1=36\rightarrow \boxed{\text{C}}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 3== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can easily spot the pattern. In the first row, there are <math>0</math> black squares. In the second row, there is <math>1</math> black square. So the pattern is that in order to find the number of black squares in a row, you need to subtract <math>1</math> from the row number. Therefore, the number of black squares in the <math>37\text{th}</math> row we subtract 1. | ||
+ | <math>37-1=36\rightarrow \boxed{\text{C}}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~sakshamsethi | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Video Solution== | ||
+ | https://youtu.be/TjN47q5-Fuw | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~savannahsolver | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== |
Latest revision as of 08:23, 10 January 2023
Problem
A "stair-step" figure is made of alternating black and white squares in each row. Rows through are shown. All rows begin and end with a white square. The number of black squares in the row is
Solution 1
The best way to solve this problem is to find patterns and to utilize them to our advantage. For example, we can't really do anything without knowing how many squares there are in the 37th row. But who wants to continue the diagram for 37 rows? And what if the problem said 100,000th row? It'll still be possible - but not if your method is to continue the diagram...
So hopefully there's a pattern. We find a pattern by noticing what is changing from row 1 to row 2. Basically, for the next row, we are just adding 2 squares (1 on each side) to the number of squares we had in the previous row. So each time we're adding 2. So how can we find , if is the number of squares in the row of this diagram? We can't just say that , because it doesn't work for the first row. But since 1 is the first term, we have to EXCLUDE the first term, meaning that we must subtract 1 from a. Thus, . So in the 37th row we will have .
You may now be thinking - aha, we're finished. But we're only half finished. We still need to find how many black squares there are in these 73 squares. Well let's see - they alternate white-black-white-black... but we can't divide by two - there aren't exactly as many white squares as black squares... there's always 1 more white square... aha! If we subtract 1 from the number of squares (1 white square), we will have exactly 2 times the number of black squares.
Thus, the number of black squares is
36 is
Solution 2
Note that each row adds one black and one white square to the end of the previous one, and then shifts the new row over a little. Since the first row had no black squares, the number of black squares in any row is one less than the row number.
Now that this has been established, we just have
Solution 3
We can easily spot the pattern. In the first row, there are black squares. In the second row, there is black square. So the pattern is that in order to find the number of black squares in a row, you need to subtract from the row number. Therefore, the number of black squares in the row we subtract 1.
~sakshamsethi
Video Solution
~savannahsolver
See Also
1985 AJHSME (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 6 |
Followed by Problem 8 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AJHSME/AMC 8 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.