Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "Nesbitt's Inequality"
m (typo)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
with equality when all the variables are equal.
 
with equality when all the variables are equal.
  
−
All of the proofs below generalize to proof the following more general inequality.
+
All of the proofs below generalize to prove the following more general inequality.
  
 
If <math> a_1, \ldots a_n </math> are positive and <math> \sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i = s </math>, then  
 
If <math> a_1, \ldots a_n </math> are positive and <math> \sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i = s </math>, then  
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
== Proofs ==
 
== Proofs ==
 +
 +
=== By Smoothing ===
 +
 +
We may normalize so that <math>a+b+c=1</math>. Then we wish to show<cmath>\frac{a}{1-a}+\frac{b}{1-b}+\frac{c}{1-c}\geq\frac32.</cmath>The equality case is when <math>a=b=c</math> so we can use smoothing. We wish to show that if <math>a\neq b</math> then<cmath>\frac{a}{1-a}+\frac{b}{1-b}>2\cdot\frac{\frac{a+b}2}{1-\frac{a+b}2}.</cmath>If this is true, then if the minimum occurs at a point where <math>a\neq b</math> then we can replace <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> with their average and then the expression decreases, so that cannot be the minimum. Thus the minimum occurs where they are all equal, and we would be done.
 +
 +
Expanding both sides of the inequality and clearing denominators we get <cmath>a^2+b^2>2ab,</cmath>which is true because <math>a\neq b</math>.
  
 
=== By Rearrangement ===
 
=== By Rearrangement ===
Line 153: Line 159:
  
 
Let <math>[x,y,z]=\sum_{sym} a^xb^yc^z</math>. Expanding out we get that our inequality is equivalent to <cmath>\sum_{cyc} a^3+\sum_{sym} a^2b+\sum_{cyc} abc \geq \frac{3(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)}{2}</cmath> This means <cmath>[3,0,0]/2+[2,1,0]+[1,1,1]/2\geq \frac{3}{2}(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)</cmath> So it follows that we must prove <cmath>[3,0,0]+2[2,1,0]+[1,1,1]\geq 3([2,1,0]+[1,1,1]/3)</cmath> So it follows that we must prove <math>[3,0,0]\geq [2,1,0]</math> which immediately follows from Muirhead's.
 
Let <math>[x,y,z]=\sum_{sym} a^xb^yc^z</math>. Expanding out we get that our inequality is equivalent to <cmath>\sum_{cyc} a^3+\sum_{sym} a^2b+\sum_{cyc} abc \geq \frac{3(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)}{2}</cmath> This means <cmath>[3,0,0]/2+[2,1,0]+[1,1,1]/2\geq \frac{3}{2}(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)</cmath> So it follows that we must prove <cmath>[3,0,0]+2[2,1,0]+[1,1,1]\geq 3([2,1,0]+[1,1,1]/3)</cmath> So it follows that we must prove <math>[3,0,0]\geq [2,1,0]</math> which immediately follows from Muirhead's.
−
[[Category:Inequality]]
+
 
−
[[Category:Theorems]]
+
[[Category:Algebra]]
 +
[[Category:Inequalities]]

Latest revision as of 15:21, 24 October 2022

Nesbitt's Inequality is a theorem which, although rarely cited, has many instructive proofs. It states that for positive $a, b, c$,

$\frac{a}{b+c} + \frac{b}{c+a} + \frac{c}{a+b} \ge \frac{3}{2}$,

with equality when all the variables are equal.

All of the proofs below generalize to prove the following more general inequality.

If $a_1, \ldots a_n$ are positive and $\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i = s$, then

$\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{a_i}{s-a_i} \geq \frac{n}{n-1}$,

or equivalently

$\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{s}{s-a_i} \geq \frac{n^2}{n-1}$,

with equality when all the $a_i$ are equal.

Proofs

By Smoothing

We may normalize so that $a+b+c=1$. Then we wish to show\[\frac{a}{1-a}+\frac{b}{1-b}+\frac{c}{1-c}\geq\frac32.\]The equality case is when $a=b=c$ so we can use smoothing. We wish to show that if $a\neq b$ then\[\frac{a}{1-a}+\frac{b}{1-b}>2\cdot\frac{\frac{a+b}2}{1-\frac{a+b}2}.\]If this is true, then if the minimum occurs at a point where $a\neq b$ then we can replace $a$ and $b$ with their average and then the expression decreases, so that cannot be the minimum. Thus the minimum occurs where they are all equal, and we would be done.

Expanding both sides of the inequality and clearing denominators we get \[a^2+b^2>2ab,\]which is true because $a\neq b$.

By Rearrangement

Note that $a,b,c$ and $\frac{1}{b+c} = \frac{1}{a+b+c -a}$, $\frac{1}{c+a} = \frac{1}{a+b+c -b}$, $\frac{1}{a+b} = \frac{1}{a+b+c -c}$ are sorted in the same order. Then by the rearrangement inequality,

$2 \left( \frac{a}{b+c} + \frac{b}{c+a} + \frac{c}{a+b} \right) \ge \frac{b}{b+c} + \frac{c}{b+c} + \frac{c}{c+a} + \frac{a}{c+a} + \frac{a}{a+b} + \frac{b}{a+b} = 3$.

For equality to occur, since we changed ${} a \cdot \frac{1}{b+c} + b \cdot \frac{1}{c+a}$ to $b \cdot \frac{1}{b+c} + a \cdot \frac{1}{c+a}$, we must have $a=b$, so by symmetry, all the variables must be equal.

By Cauchy

By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have

$[(b+c) + (c+a) + (a+b)]\left( \frac{1}{b+c} + \frac{1}{c+a} + \frac{1}{a+b} \right) \geq 9$,

or

$2\left( \frac{a+b+c}{b+c} + \frac{a+b+c}{c+a} + \frac{a+b+c}{a+b} \right) \geq 9$,

as desired. Equality occurs when $(b+c)^2 = (c+a)^2 = (a+b)^2$, i.e., when $a=b=c$.

We also present three closely related variations of this proof, which illustrate how AM-HM is related to AM-GM and Cauchy.

By AM-GM

By applying AM-GM twice, we have

$[(b+c) + (c+a) + (a+b)] \left( \frac{1}{b+c} + \frac{1}{c+a} + \frac{1}{a+b} \right) \geq 3 [(b+c)(c+a)(a+b)]^{\frac{1}{3}} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{(b+c)(c+a)(a+b)}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}} = 9$,

which yields the desired inequality.

By Expansion and AM-GM

We consider the equivalent inequality

$[(b+c) + (c+a) + (a+c)]\left( \frac{1}{b+c} + \frac{1}{c+a} + \frac{1}{a+b} \right) \geq 9$.

Setting $x = b+c, y= c+a, z= a+b$, we expand the left side to obtain

$3 + \frac{x}{y} + \frac{y}{x} + \frac{y}{z} + \frac{z}{y} + \frac{z}{x} + \frac{x}{z} \geq 9$,

which follows from $\frac{x}{y} + \frac{y}{x} \geq 2$, etc., by AM-GM, with equality when $x=y=z$.

By AM-HM

The AM-HM inequality for three variables,

$\frac{x+y+z}{3} \geq \frac{3}{\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{y} + \frac{1}{z}}$,

is equivalent to

$(x+y+z) \left(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{y} + \frac{1}{z}\right) \geq 9$.

Setting $x=b+c, y=c+a, z=a+b$ yields the desired inequality.

By Substitution

The numbers $x = \frac{a}{b+c}, y = \frac{b}{c+a}, z = \frac{c}{a+b}$ satisfy the condition $xy + yz + zx + 2xyz = 1$. Thus it is sufficient to prove that if any numbers $x,y,z$ satisfy $xy + yz + zx + 2xyz = 1$, then $x+y+z \geq \frac{3}{2}$.

Suppose, on the contrary, that $x+y+z < \frac{3}{2}$. We then have $xy + yz + zx \leq \frac{(x+y+z)^2}{3} < \frac{3}{4}$, and $2xyz \leq 2 \left( \frac{x+y+z}{3} \right)^3 < \frac{1}{4}$. Adding these inequalities yields $xy + yz + zx + 2xyz < 1$, a contradiction.

By Normalization and AM-HM

We may normalize so that $a+b+c = 1$. It is then sufficient to prove

$\frac{1}{b+c} + \frac{1}{c+a} + \frac{1}{a+b} \geq \frac{9}{2}$,

which follows from AM-HM.

By Weighted AM-HM

We may normalize so that $a+b+c =1$.

We first note that by the rearrangement inequality or the fact that $(a-b)^2 + (b-c)^2 + (c-a)^2 \geq 0$,

$3 (ab + bc + ca) \leq a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 2(ab + bc + ca)$,

so

$\frac{1}{a(b+c) + b(c+a) + c(a+b)} \geq \frac{1}{\frac{2}{3}(a+b+c)^2} = \frac{3}{2}$.

Since $a+b+c = 1$, weighted AM-HM gives us

$a\cdot \frac{1}{b+c} + b \cdot \frac{1}{c+a} + c \cdot \frac{1}{a+b} \geq \frac{1}{a(b+c) + b(c+a) + c(a+b)} \geq \frac{3}{2}$.

By Muirhead's and Cauchy

By Cauchy, \[\sum_{\text{cyc}}\frac{a^2}{ab + ac} \geq \frac{(a + b + c)^2}{2(ab + ac + bc)} = \frac{a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 2(ab + ac + bc)}{2(ab + ac + bc)}\] \[= 1 + \frac{a^2 + b^2 + c^2}{2(ab + ac + bc)} \geq \frac{3}{2}\] since $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \geq ab + ac + bc$ by Muirhead as $[1, 1, 0]\prec [2, 0, 0]$

Another Interesting Method

Let \[S=\frac{a}{b+c}+\frac{b}{c+a}+\frac{c}{a+b}\] And \[M=\frac{b}{b+c}+\frac{c}{c+a}+\frac{a}{a+b}\] And \[N=\frac{c}{b+c}+\frac{a}{c+a}+\frac{b}{a+b}\] Now, we get \[M+N=3\] Also by AM-GM; \[M+S\geq 3\] and \[N+S\geq 3\] \[\implies M+N+2S\geq 6\] \[\implies 2S\geq 3\] \[\implies S\geq \frac{3}{2}\]

By Muirhead's and expansion

Let $[x,y,z]=\sum_{sym} a^xb^yc^z$. Expanding out we get that our inequality is equivalent to \[\sum_{cyc} a^3+\sum_{sym} a^2b+\sum_{cyc} abc \geq \frac{3(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)}{2}\] This means \[[3,0,0]/2+[2,1,0]+[1,1,1]/2\geq \frac{3}{2}(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)\] So it follows that we must prove \[[3,0,0]+2[2,1,0]+[1,1,1]\geq 3([2,1,0]+[1,1,1]/3)\] So it follows that we must prove $[3,0,0]\geq [2,1,0]$ which immediately follows from Muirhead's.

Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=Nesbitt%27s_Inequality&oldid=179434"