Difference between revisions of "Talk:Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes"
(New page: Erm... Shouldn't it be "infi<b>NI</b>tude"? ~~~~) |
Enderramsby (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Erm... Shouldn't it be "infi<b>NI</b>tude"? [[User:Fedja|Fedja]] 18:53, 11 January 2008 (EST) | Erm... Shouldn't it be "infi<b>NI</b>tude"? [[User:Fedja|Fedja]] 18:53, 11 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | Or maybe it should be infiniteness. [[User:Colball|Colball]] , 21/11/2019 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Actually, people didn't understand "infinity" at the time, so he said something like "take 10 of them but there are still more, 100 but still more primes, etc. ~ [[User:Enderramsby|enderramsby]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:59, 14 August 2022
Erm... Shouldn't it be "infiNItude"? Fedja 18:53, 11 January 2008 (EST) Or maybe it should be infiniteness. Colball , 21/11/2019
Actually, people didn't understand "infinity" at the time, so he said something like "take 10 of them but there are still more, 100 but still more primes, etc. ~ enderramsby
