Difference between revisions of "2022 AIME I Problems/Problem 14"

Revision as of 23:06, 17 February 2022

Problem

Given $\triangle ABC$ and a point $P$ on one of its sides, call line $\ell$ the splitting line of $\triangle ABC$ through $P$ if $\ell$ passes through $P$ and divides $\triangle ABC$ into two polygons of equal perimeter. Let $\triangle ABC$ be a triangle where $BC = 219$ and $AB$ and $AC$ are positive integers. Let $M$ and $N$ be the midpoints of $\overline{AB}$ and $\overline{AC}$ , respectively, and suppose that the splitting lines of $\triangle ABC$ through $M$ and $N$ intersect at $30^{\circ}$ . Find the perimeter of $\triangle ABC$ .

The Geometry Part - Solution 1

Consider the splitting line through $M$ . Extend $D$ on ray $BC$ such that $CD=CA$ . Then the splitting line bisects segment $BD$ , so in particular it is the midline of triangle $ABD$ and thus it is parallel to $AD$ . But since triangle $ACD$ is isosceles, we can easily see $AD$ is parallel to the angle bisector of $C$ , so the splitting line is also parallel to this bisector, and similar for the splitting line through $N$ . Some simple angle chasing reveals the condition is now equivalent to $\angle A=120^\circ$ .

- MortemEtInteritum

The Geometry Part - Solution 2

Let $PM$ and $QN$ be the splitting lines. Reflect $B$ across $Q$ to be $B'$ and $C$ across $P$ to be $C'$ . Take $S_B$ and $S_C$ , which are spiral similarity centers on the other side of $BC$ as $A$ such that $\triangle S_BB'C \sim \triangle S_BBA$ and $\triangle S_CC'B \sim \triangle S_CCA$ . This gets that because $\angle S_BCB = \angle S_BCB' = \angle S_BAB$ and $\angle S_CBC = \angle S_CBC' = \angle S_CAC$ , then $S_B$ and $S_C$ are on $\triangle ABC$ 's circumcircle. Now, we know that $\triangle S_BBB' \sim \triangle S_BAC$ and $\triangle S_CCC' \sim \triangle S_CAB$ so because $BA=B'C$ and $CA=C'B$ , then $S_BB=SBB'$ and $S_CC=S_CC'$ and $S_BQ \perp BC$ and $S_CP \perp BC$ .

We also notice that because $Q$ and $N$ correspond on $\triangle S_BBB'$ and $\triangle S_BAC$ , and because $P$ and $M$ correspond on $\triangle S_CCC'$ and $\triangle S_CAB$ , then the angle formed by $NQ$ and $BA$ is equal to the angle formed by $B'C$ and $NQ$ which is equal to $\angle BS_BQ = \angle QS_BB'$ . Thus, $\angle CBA=2\angle CQN$ . Similarly, $\angle BCA = 2\angle QPM$ and so $\angle CBA + \angle BCA = 2\angle PQN + 2\angle QPM = 60^{\circ}$ and $\angle A = 120^{\circ}$ .

- kevinmathz

The NT Part

We now need to solve $a^2+ab+b^2 = 3^2\cdot 73^2$ . A quick $(\bmod 9)$ check gives that $3\mid a$ and $3\mid b$ . Thus, it's equivalent to solve $x^2+xy+y^2 = 73^2$ .

Let $\omega$ be one root of $\omega^2+\omega+1=0$ . Then, recall that $\mathbb Z[\omega]$ is the ring of integers of $\mathbb Q[\sqrt{-3}]$ and is a unique factorization domain. Notice that $N(x-y\omega) = (x-y\omega)(x-y\omega^2) = x^2-xy+y^2$ . Therefore, it suffices to find an element of $\mathbb Z[\omega]$ with the norm $73^2$ .

To do so, we factor $73$ in $\mathbb Z[\omega]$ . Since it's $1\pmod 3$ , it must split. A quick inspection gives $73 = (8-\omega)(8-\omega^2)$ . Thus, $N(8-\omega) = 73$ , so \begin{align*} 73^2 &= N((8-\omega)^2) \\ &= N(64 - 16\omega + \omega^2) \\ &= N(64 - 16\omega + (-1-\omega)) \\ &= N(63 - 17\omega), \end{align*}giving the solution $x=63$ and $y=17$ , yielding $a=189$ and $b=51$ , so the sum is $\boxed{459}$ . Since $8-\omega$ and $8-\omega^2$ are primes in $\mathbb Z[\omega]$ , the solution must divide $73^2$ . One can then easily check that this is the unique solution.

- MarkBcc168

==Solution (Geometry + Number Theory)

Denote $BC = a$ , $CA = b$ , $AB = c$ .

Let the splitting line of $\triangle ABC$ through $M$ (resp. $N$ ) crosses $\triangle ABC$ at another point $X$ (resp. $Y$ ).

WLOG, we assume $c \leq b$ .

$\textbf{Case 1}$ : $a \leq c \leq b$ .

We extend segment $AB$ to $D$ , such that $BD = a$ . We extend segment $AC$ to $E$ , such that $CE = a$ .

In this case, $X$ is the midpoint of $AE$ , and $Y$ is the midpoint of $AD$ .

Because $M$ and $X$ are the midpoints of $AB$ and $AE$ , respectively, $MX \parallel BE$ . Because $N$ and $Y$ are the midpoints of $AC$ and $AD$ , respectively, $NY \parallel CD$ .

Because $CB = CE$ , $\angle CBE =\angle CEB = \frac{\angle ACB}{2}$ . Because $BC = BD$ , $\angle BCD = \angle BDC = \frac{\angle ABC}{2}$ .

Let $BE$ and $CD$ intersect at $O$ . Because $MX \parallel BE$ and $NY \parallel CD$ , the angle formed between lines $MX$ and $NY$ is congruent to $\angle BOD$ . Hence, $\angle BOD = 30^\circ$ or $150^\circ$ .

We have $\begin{align*} \angle BOD & = \angle CBE + \angle BCD \\ & = \frac{\angle ACB}{2} + \frac{\angle ABC}{2} \\ & = 90^\circ - \frac{\angle A}{2} . \end{align*}$

Hence, we must have $\angle BOD = 30^\circ$ , not $150^\circ$ . Hence, $\angle A = 120^\circ$ .

This implies $a > b$ and $a >c$ . This contradicts the condition specified for this case.

Therefore, this case is infeasible.

$\textbf{Case 2}$ : $c \leq a \leq b$ .

We extend segment $CB$ to $D$ , such that $BD = c$ . We extend segment $AC$ to $E$ , such that $CE = a$ .

In this case, $X$ is the midpoint of $AE$ , and $Y$ is the midpoint of $CD$ .

Because $M$ and $X$ are the midpoints of $AB$ and $AE$ , respectively, $MX \parallel BE$ . Because $N$ and $Y$ are the midpoints of $AC$ and $CD$ , respectively, $NY \parallel AD$ .

Because $CB = CE$ , $\angle CBE =\angle CEB = \frac{\angle ACB}{2}$ . Because $BA = BD$ , $\angle BAD = \angle BDA = \frac{\angle ABC}{2}$ .

Let $O$ be a point of $AC$ , such that $BO \parallel AD$ . Hence, $\angle OBC = \angle BDA = \frac{B}{2}$ .

Because $MX \parallel BE$ and $NY \parallel AD$ and $AD \parallel BO$ , the angle formed between lines $MX$ and $NY$ is congruent to $\angle OBE$ . Hence, $\angle OBE = 30^\circ$ or $150^\circ$ .

We have $\begin{align*} \angle OBE & = \angle OBC + \angle CBE \\ & = \frac{\angle ABC}{2} + \frac{\angle ACB}{2} \\ & = 90^\circ - \frac{\angle A}{2} . \end{align*}$

Hence, we must have $\angle OBE = 30^\circ$ , not $150^\circ$ . Hence, $\angle A = 120^\circ$ .

This implies $a > b$ and $a >c$ . This contradicts the condition specified for this case.

Therefore, this case is infeasible.

$\textbf{Case 3}$ : $c \leq b \leq a$ .

We extend segment $CB$ to $D$ , such that $BD = c$ . We extend segment $BC$ to $E$ , such that $CE = b$ .

In this case, $X$ is the midpoint of $BE$ , and $Y$ is the midpoint of $CD$ .

Because $M$ and $X$ are the midpoints of $AB$ and $BE$ , respectively, $MX \parallel AE$ . Because $N$ and $Y$ are the midpoints of $AC$ and $CD$ , respectively, $NY \parallel AD$ .

Because $CA = CE$ , $\angle CAE =\angle CEB = \frac{\angle ACB}{2}$ . Because $BA = BD$ , $\angle BAD = \angle BDA = \frac{\angle ABC}{2}$ .

Because $MX \parallel AE$ and $NY \parallel AD$ , the angle formed between lines $MX$ and $NY$ is congruent to $\angle DAE$ . Hence, $\angle DAE = 30^\circ$ or $150^\circ$ .

We have $\begin{align*} \angle DAE & = \angle BAD + \angle CAE + \angle BAC \\ & = \frac{\angle ABC}{2} + \frac{\angle ACB}{2} + \angle BAC \\ & = 90^\circ + \frac{\angle BAC}{2} . \end{align*}$

Hence, we must have $\angle OBE = 150^\circ$ , not $30^\circ$ . Hence, $\angle BAC = 120^\circ$ .

In $\triangle ABC$ , by applying the law of cosines, we have $\begin{align*} a^2 & = b^2 + c^2 - 2bc \cos \angle BAC\\ & = b^2 + c^2 - 2bc \cos 120^\circ \\ & = b^2 + c^2 + bc . \end{align*}$

Because $a = 219$ , we have $b^2 + c^2 + bc = 219^2 .$

Now, we find integer solution(s) of this equation with $c \leq b$ .

Multiplying this equation by 4, we get $\left( 2 c + b \right)^2 + 3 b^2 = 438^2 . \hspace{1cm} (1)$

Denote $d = 2 c + b$ . Because $c \leq b$ , $b < d \leq 3 b$ .

Because $438^2 - 3 b^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$ , $d^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$ . Thus, $d \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$ . This implies $d^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{9}$ .

We also have $438^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{9}$ . Hence, $3 b^2 \equiv 0 \pmod{9}$ . This implies $b \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$ .

Denote $b = 3 p$ and $d = 3 q$ . Hence, $p < q \leq 3 p$ . Hence, Equation (1) can be written as $q^2 + 3 p^2 = 146^2 . \hspace{1cm} (2)$

Now, we solve this equation.

First, we find an upper bound of $q$ .

We have $q^2 + 3 p^2 \geq q^2 + 3 \left( \frac{q}{3} \right)^2 = \frac{4 q^2}{3}$ . Hence, $\frac{4 q^2}{3} \leq 146^2$ . Hence, $q \leq 73 \sqrt{3} < 73 \cdot 1.8 = 131.4$ . Because $q$ is an integer, we must have $q \leq 131$ .

Second, we find a lower bound of $q$ .

We have $q^2 + 3 p^2 < q^2 + 3 q^2 = 4 q^2$ . Hence, $4 q^2 > 146^2$ . Hence, $q > 73$ . Because $q$ is an integer, we must have $q \geq 74$ .

Now, we find the integer solutions of $p$ and $q$ that satisfy Equation (2) with $74 \leq q \leq 131$ .

First, modulo 9, $\begin{align*} q^2 & \equiv 146^2 - 3 p^2 \\ & \equiv 4 - 3 \cdot ( 0 \mbox{ or } 1 ) \\ & \equiv 4 \mbox{ or } 1 . \end{align*}$

Hence $q \equiv \pm 1, \pm 2 \pmod{9}$ .

Second, modulo 5, $\begin{align*} q^2 & \equiv 146^2 - 3 p^2 \\ & \equiv 1 + 2 p^2 \\ & \equiv 1 + 2 \cdot ( 0 \mbox{ or } 1 \mbox{ or } -1 ) \\ & \equiv 1 \mbox{ or } 3 \mbox{ or } - 1 . \end{align*}$

Because $q^2 \equiv 0 \mbox{ or } 1 \mbox{ or } - 1$ , we must have $q^2 \equiv 1 \mbox{ or } - 1$ . Hence, $5 \nmid q$ .

Third, modulo 7, $\begin{align*} q^2 & \equiv 146^2 - 3 p^2 \\ & \equiv 1 - 3 \cdot ( 0 \mbox{ or } 1 \mbox{ or } 5 \mbox{ or } 2 ) \\ & \equiv 1 \mbox{ or } 2 \mbox{ or } 3 \mbox{ or } 5 . \end{align*}$

Because $q^2 \equiv 0 \mbox{ or } 1 \mbox{ or } 2 \mbox{ or } 4 \pmod{ 7 }$ , we must have $q^2 \equiv 1 \mbox{ or } 2 \pmod{7}$ . Hence, $q \equiv 1, 3, 4, 6 \pmod{7}$ .

Given all conditions above, the possible $q$ are 74, 83, 88, 92, 97, 101, 106, 109, 116, 118, 127.

By testing all these numbers, we find that the only solution is $q = 97$ . This implies $p = 63$ .

Hence, $b = 3p = 189$ and $d = 3q = 291$ . Hence, $c = \frac{d - b}{2} = 51$ .

Therefore, the perimeter of $\triangle ABC$ is $b + c + a = 189 + 51 + 219 = \boxed{\textbf{(459) }}$ .

~Steven Chen (wwww.professorchenedu.com)

Video Solution

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkous52vPps&t=3023s

~Steven Chen (wwww.professorchenedu.com)

Page

Toolbox

Search