Difference between revisions of "1966 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(A full proof of the question is given) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
and inserting this into the above equation we get: | and inserting this into the above equation we get: | ||
<cmath>\iff a\tan \frac{\alpha -\beta}{2}\left(1+\tan \alpha \tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2}\right)+b\tan \frac{\beta -\alpha}{2}\left(1+\tan \beta \tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2} \right)=0 </cmath> | <cmath>\iff a\tan \frac{\alpha -\beta}{2}\left(1+\tan \alpha \tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2}\right)+b\tan \frac{\beta -\alpha}{2}\left(1+\tan \beta \tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2} \right)=0 </cmath> | ||
− | <cmath>\underbrace{\iff}_{\tan -A=-\tan | + | <cmath>\underbrace{\iff}_{\tan -A=-\tan A}a\tan \frac{\alpha -\beta}{2}\left(1+\tan \alpha \tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2}\right)-b\tan \frac{\alpha -\beta}{2}\left(1+\tan \beta \tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2} \right)=0 </cmath> |
<cmath>\iff \tan \frac{\alpha -\beta}{2}\left(a-b+\tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2}(a\tan\alpha -b\tan \beta) \right)=0 </cmath> | <cmath>\iff \tan \frac{\alpha -\beta}{2}\left(a-b+\tan \frac{\alpha +\beta}{2}(a\tan\alpha -b\tan \beta) \right)=0 </cmath> | ||
Now, since <math>a>b</math> and the definitions of <math>a,b,\alpha,\beta</math> being part of the definition of a triangle, <math>\alpha >\beta</math>. | Now, since <math>a>b</math> and the definitions of <math>a,b,\alpha,\beta</math> being part of the definition of a triangle, <math>\alpha >\beta</math>. |
Revision as of 17:54, 13 January 2022
Let ,
, and
be the lengths of the sides of a triangle, and
respectively, the angles opposite these sides. If,
Prove that the triangle is isosceles.
Solution
We'll prove that the triangle is isosceles with .
We'll prove that
. Assume by way of contradiction WLOG that
.
First notice that as
then and the identity
our equation becomes:
Using the identity
and inserting this into the above equation we get:
Now, since
and the definitions of
being part of the definition of a triangle,
.
Now,
(as
and the angles are positive),
, and furthermore,
. By all the above,
Which contradicts our assumption, thus
. By the symmetry of the condition, using the same arguments,
. Hence
.
See Also
1966 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |