Difference between revisions of "1979 IMO Problems/Problem 5"
(→Solution) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== See Also == {{IMO box|year=1979|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | == See Also == {{IMO box|year=1979|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | ||
Let <math>\Sigma_1= \sum_{k=1}^{5} kx_{k}</math>, <math>\Sigma_2=\sum_{k=1}^{5} k^{3}x_{k}</math> and <math>\Sigma_3=\sum_{k=1}^{5} k^{5}x_{k}</math>. For all pairs <math>i,j\in \mathbb{Z}</math>, let <cmath>\Sigma(i,j)=i^2j^2\Sigma_1-(i^2+j^2)\Sigma_2+\Sigma_3</cmath> | Let <math>\Sigma_1= \sum_{k=1}^{5} kx_{k}</math>, <math>\Sigma_2=\sum_{k=1}^{5} k^{3}x_{k}</math> and <math>\Sigma_3=\sum_{k=1}^{5} k^{5}x_{k}</math>. For all pairs <math>i,j\in \mathbb{Z}</math>, let <cmath>\Sigma(i,j)=i^2j^2\Sigma_1-(i^2+j^2)\Sigma_2+\Sigma_3</cmath> | ||
− | Then we have one hand | + | Then we have on one hand |
<cmath> | <cmath> | ||
\Sigma(i,j)=i^2j^2\Sigma_1-(i^2+j^2)\Sigma_2+\Sigma_3=\sum_{k=1}^5(i^2j^2k-(i^2+j^2)k^3+k^5)x_k | \Sigma(i,j)=i^2j^2\Sigma_1-(i^2+j^2)\Sigma_2+\Sigma_3=\sum_{k=1}^5(i^2j^2k-(i^2+j^2)k^3+k^5)x_k | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
</cmath> | </cmath> | ||
for <math>n=1,2,3,4</math> | for <math>n=1,2,3,4</math> | ||
− | From the | + | From the latter and (2) we also have |
<cmath> | <cmath> | ||
\Sigma(n,n+1)=a(a-n^2)(a-(n+1)^2))\geq 0\implies a\notin (n^2,(n+1)^2) | \Sigma(n,n+1)=a(a-n^2)(a-(n+1)^2))\geq 0\implies a\notin (n^2,(n+1)^2) |
Revision as of 20:46, 27 November 2021
Problem
Determine all real numbers a for which there exists positive reals which satisfy the relations
Solution
Discussion thread can be found here: [1]
This problem needs a solution. If you have a solution for it, please help us out by adding it.
See Also
1979 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 6 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |
Let , and . For all pairs , let Then we have on one hand Therefore \\(1) and on the other hand \\ (2) Then from (1) we have and from (2) so Besides we also have from (1) and from (2) and for where in the right hand we have that , so , and , so for From the latter and (2) we also have So we have that
If , take , for . Then , , and