Difference between revisions of "1974 IMO Problems/Problem 4"
Durianaops (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Problem== Consider decompositions of an <math>8\times8</math> chessboard into <math>p</math> non-overlapping rectangles subject to the following conditions: (i) Each rectan...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
− | {{ | + | Since each rectangle has the same number of black squares as white squares, <math>a_1+a_2+\ldots +a_p=\frac{64}{2}=32</math>. Clearly <math>a_i\ge i</math> for <math>i=1</math> to <math>i=p</math> so <math>32=a_1+a_2+\ldots + a_p\ge 1+2+\ldots +p=\frac{p(p+1)}{2}</math> so this forces <math>p\le 7</math>. It is possible to decompose the board into <math>7</math> rectangles, as we will show later. But first let us find all such sequences <math>a_i</math>. |
+ | Now <math>32-a_7=a_1+a_2+\ldots +a_6\ge 1+2+\ldots +6=21\implies 11\le a_7</math>. For a rectangle to have <math>11</math> white squares, it will have an area of <math>22</math> so it's dimensions are either <math>1\times 22</math> or <math>2\times 11</math> - neither of which would fit on a <math>8\times 8</math> board. So <math>a_7\not= 11\implies a_7\le 10</math>. | ||
+ | If <math>a_7=10</math> (which could fit as a <math>4\times 5</math> rectangle) then <math>a_1+a_2+\ldots a_6=22</math>. Then <math>22-a_6\ge 1+2+\ldots +5=15</math> so <math>7\ge a_6</math>. So <math>a_1,a_2,\ldots ,a_6</math> are 6 numbers among 1-7. If <math>1\le k\le 7</math> is the number that is not equal to any <math>a_i</math>, then <math>22=a_1+a_2+\ldots +a_7=1+2+\ldots +7-k=28-k</math> so <math>k=6</math>. Then <math>a_1=1,a_2=2,a_3=3,a_4=4,a_5=5,a_6=7,a_7=10</math>. Such a decomposition is possible. Take a <math>4\times 5</math> rectangle on the top left corner, where there are <math>4</math> squares horizontally and <math>5</math> vertically. Then directly below use a <math>7\times 2,1\times 2</math> and a <math>8\times 1</math> rectangle to cover the 3 rows below it. It's simple from there. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Similarly, you can find the other possibilities as <math>\{a_1,a_2,\ldots ,a_7\}=\{1,2,3,4,5,8,9\}</math> or <math>\{1,2,3,4,6,7,9\}</math> or <math>\{1,2,3,5,6,7,8\}</math>. Tilings are not hard to find. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The above solution was posted and copyrighted by WakeUp. The original thread for this problem can be found here: [https://aops.com/community/p2554359] | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{IMO box|year=1974|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | {{IMO box|year=1974|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | ||
[[Category:Olympiad Geometry Problems]] | [[Category:Olympiad Geometry Problems]] |
Latest revision as of 15:03, 29 January 2021
Problem
Consider decompositions of an chessboard into non-overlapping rectangles subject to the following conditions:
(i) Each rectangle has as many white squares as black squares.
(ii) If is the number of white squares in the -th rectangle, then
Find the maximum value of for which such a decomposition is possible. For this value of determine all possible sequences
Solution
Since each rectangle has the same number of black squares as white squares, . Clearly for to so so this forces . It is possible to decompose the board into rectangles, as we will show later. But first let us find all such sequences . Now . For a rectangle to have white squares, it will have an area of so it's dimensions are either or - neither of which would fit on a board. So .
If (which could fit as a rectangle) then . Then so . So are 6 numbers among 1-7. If is the number that is not equal to any , then so . Then . Such a decomposition is possible. Take a rectangle on the top left corner, where there are squares horizontally and vertically. Then directly below use a and a rectangle to cover the 3 rows below it. It's simple from there.
Similarly, you can find the other possibilities as or or . Tilings are not hard to find.
The above solution was posted and copyrighted by WakeUp. The original thread for this problem can be found here: [1]
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
1974 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |