Difference between revisions of "Functional equation for the zeta function"
(→Two useful identities) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
B_1(x)\triangleq\{x\}-\frac12=-\sum_{n=1}^\infty{\sin(2\pi nx)\over\pi n} | B_1(x)\triangleq\{x\}-\frac12=-\sum_{n=1}^\infty{\sin(2\pi nx)\over\pi n} | ||
</cmath> | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | and the Laplace transform identity that | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | {\Gamma(z)\over r^z}=\int_0^\infty\tau^{z-1}e^{-z\tau}\mathrm d\tau | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | where <math>-\pi/2\le\arg z\le\pi/2</math> | ||
=== A formula for <math>\zeta(s)</math> in <math>-1<\sigma<0</math> === | === A formula for <math>\zeta(s)</math> in <math>-1<\sigma<0</math> === | ||
Line 31: | Line 39: | ||
&={B_2\over2}+{s+1\over2}\int_1^\infty{B_2(x)\over x^{s+2}}\mathrm dx | &={B_2\over2}+{s+1\over2}\int_1^\infty{B_2(x)\over x^{s+2}}\mathrm dx | ||
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | When <math>-1<\sigma<0</math> there is | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | -s\int_0^1{B_1(x)\over x^{s+1}}\mathrm dx=\frac12+{1\over s-1} | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a result, we obtain a formula for <math>\zeta(s)</math> for <math>-1<\sigma<0</math>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \zeta(s)=-s\int_0^\infty{B_1(x)\over x^{s+1}}\mathrm dx | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Expansion of <math>B_1(x)</math> into Fourier series === | ||
+ | |||
+ | In order to go deeper, let's plug | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | B_1(x)\triangleq\{x\}-\frac12=-\sum_{n=1}^\infty{\sin(2\pi nx)\over\pi n} | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | into the previously obtained formula, so that | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath> | ||
+ | \begin | ||
+ | \zeta(s)=s\int_0^\infty\sum_{n=1}^\infty{\sin(2\pi nx)\over n\pi}{\mathrm dx\over x^{s+1}} | ||
</cmath> | </cmath> |
Revision as of 02:37, 13 January 2021
The functional equation for Riemann zeta function is a result due to analytic continuation of Riemann zeta function:
Proof
Preparation
There are multiple proofs for the functional equation for Riemann zeta function, and this page presents a light-weighted approach which merely relies on the Fourier series for the first periodic Bernoulli polynomial that
and the Laplace transform identity that
where
A formula for in
In this article, we will use the common convention that where . As a result, we say that the original Dirichlet series definition converges only for . However, if we were to apply Euler-Maclaurin summation on this definition, we obtain
in which we can extend the ROC of the latter integral to via integration by parts:
When there is
As a result, we obtain a formula for for :
Expansion of into Fourier series
In order to go deeper, let's plug
into the previously obtained formula, so that
\[\begin \zeta(s)=s\int_0^\infty\sum_{n=1}^\infty{\sin(2\pi nx)\over n\pi}{\mathrm dx\over x^{s+1}}\] (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)